Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31880408›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2020

Investigation of multiphasic 3D-bioplotted scaffolds for site-specific chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells for osteochondral tissue engineering applications.

Liliana F Mellor, Rachel C Nordberg, Pedro Huebner, Mahsa Mohiti-Asli, Michael A Taylor, William Efird, Julia T Oxford, Jeffrey T Spang, Rohan A Shirwaiker, Elizabeth G Loboa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Application of Patient-Specific PCL/Case reports in dentistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. 3D Printing for Bone-Cartilage Interface Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liliana F MellorJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Rachel C NordbergJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-6047-6009
Pedro HuebnerEdward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Mahsa Mohiti-AsliJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Michael A TaylorJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
William EfirdDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Julia T OxfordBiomolecular Research Center, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho.
Jeffrey T SpangDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Rohan A ShirwaikerJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Elizabeth G LoboaDepartment of Biomedical, Biological and Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

Funding

Women's health: interplay of maternal diet and key demographics on neurological health in the rural frontier and remote WestP20GM103408 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI Carolyn Hovde Bohach · 2012 to 2026
$59.8M
VPS35 D620N inhibits autophagy through disrupted hyaluronic acid-CD44 signalingP20GM109095 · NIGMS · BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OXFORD, JULIA THOM · 2014 to 2023
$22.7M
Tensile Strain-Induced Osteogenesis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in 3D CultureR03EB008790 · NIBIB · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI LOBOA, ELIZABETH GRACE · 2010 to 2011
$142k
NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB008790NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103408NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease that limits mobility of the affected joint due to the degradation of articular cartilage and subchondral bone. The limited regenerative capacity of cartilage presents significant challenges when attempting to repair or reverse the effects of cartilage degradation. Tissue engineered medical products are a promising alternative to treat osteochondral degeneration due to their potential to integrate into the patient's existing tissue. The goal of this study was to create a scaffold that would induce site-specific osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASC) to generate a full osteochondral implant. Scaffolds were fabricated using 3D-bioplotting of biodegradable polycraprolactone (PCL) with either β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) or decellularized bovine cartilage extracellular matrix (dECM) to drive site-specific hASC osteogenesis and chondrogenesis, respectively. PCL-dECM scaffolds demonstrated elevated matrix deposition and organization in scaffolds seeded with hASC as well as a reduction in collagen I gene expression. 3D-bioplotted PCL scaffolds with 20% TCP demonstrated elevated calcium deposition, endogenous alkaline phosphatase activity, and osteopontin gene expression. Osteochondral scaffolds comprised of hASC-seeded 3D-bioplotted PCL-TCP, electrospun PCL, and 3D-bioplotted PCL-dECM phases were evaluated and demonstrated site-specific osteochondral tissue characteristics. This technique holds great promise as cartilage morbidity is minimized since autologous cartilage harvest is not required, tissue rejection is minimized via use of an abundant and accessible source of autologous stem cells, and biofabrication techniques allow for a precise, customizable methodology to rapidly produce the scaffold.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueBiocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesCalcium PhosphatesCartilage, ArticularCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedChondrogenesisCollagen Type IExtracellular MatrixHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisPolyestersPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue Engineeringbeta-tricalcium phosphateBiocompatible MaterialsCalcium PhosphatesCollagen Type IpolycaprolactonePolyesters3D-printingchondrogenic differentiationhuman adipose derived stem cellsosteochondralosteogenic differentiation

Identifiers

PMID31880408
PMCPMC7217039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.