Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31880322›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pathology2020

Perivascular Neuropilin-1 expression is an independent marker of improved survival in renal cell carcinoma.

Eric Morin, Cecilia Lindskog, Martin Johansson, Lars Egevad, Per Sandström, Ulrika Harmenberg, Lena Claesson-Welsh, Elin Sjöberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neuropilin-1: A Multifaceted Target for Cancer Therapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Neuropilin (NRPs) Related Pathological Conditions and Their Modulators.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric MorinDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0578-4516
Cecilia LindskogDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Martin JohanssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8510-3102
Lars EgevadDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per SandströmDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulrika HarmenbergDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lena Claesson-WelshDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4275-2000
Elin SjöbergDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SELund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment has improved in the last decade with the introduction of drugs targeting tumor angiogenesis. However, the 5-year survival of metastatic disease is still only 10-15%. Here, we explored the prognostic significance of compartment-specific expression of Neuropilin 1 (NRP1), a co-receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). NRP1 expression was analyzed in RCC tumor vessels, in perivascular tumor cells, and generally in the tumor cell compartment. Moreover, complex formation between NRP1 and the main VEGF receptor, VEGFR2, was determined. Two RCC tissue microarrays were used; a discovery cohort consisting of 64 patients and a validation cohort of 314 patients. VEGFR2/NRP1 complex formation in cis (on the same cell) and trans (between cells) configurations was determined by in situ proximity ligation assay (PLA), and NRP1 protein expression in three compartments (endothelial cells, perivascular tumor cells, and general tumor cell expression) was determined by immunofluorescent staining. Expression of NRP1 in perivascular tumor cells was explored as a marker for RCC survival in the two RCC cohorts. Results were further validated using a publicly available gene expression dataset of clear cell RCC (ccRCC). We found that VEGFR2/NRP1 trans complexes were detected in 75% of the patient samples. The presence of trans VEGFR2/NRP1 complexes or perivascular NRP1 expression was associated with a reduced tumor vessel density and size. When exploring NRP1 as a biomarker for RCC prognosis, perivascular NRP1 and general tumor cell NRP1 protein expression correlated with improved survival in the two independent cohorts, and significant results were obtained also at the mRNA level using the publicly available ccRCC gene expression dataset. Only perivascular NRP1 expression remained significant in multivariable analysis. Our work shows that perivascular NRP1 expression is an independent marker of improved survival in RCC patients, and reduces tumor vascularization by forming complexes in trans with VEGFR2 in the tumor endothelium. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersCarcinoma, Renal CellCohort StudiesEndothelial CellsFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeovascularization, PathologicNeuropilin-1PrognosisBiomarkersNeuropilin-1in situ proximity ligation assay (PLA)kidney cancerNeuropilinNRP1renal cell carcinoma (RCC)trans-complexVEGFVEGFR2

Identifiers

PMID31880322
PMCPMC7155095
OpenAlexW2901309048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.