Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31880185›Full record

ReviewTranscription2020

Transcription initiation in mycobacteria: a biophysical perspective.

Hande Boyaci, Ruth M Saecker, Elizabeth A Campbell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transcription, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Future Research Directions on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Proteins.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcription activation inEcoSal Plus · 2024
    Review
  6. Biochemical characterization ofJournal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  7. Transcriptomic responses to antibiotic exposure inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Investigation of Multi-SubunitInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The antibiotic sorangicin A inhibits promoter DNA unwinding in aProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hande BoyaciLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, The Rockefeller University , New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4276-7659
Ruth M SaeckerLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, The Rockefeller University , New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6361-7428
Elizabeth A CampbellLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, The Rockefeller University , New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1332-128X
Rockefeller University · US

Funding

Structure/function analyses of essential mycobacterial transcription regulatorsR01GM114450 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, ELIZABETH A · 2015 to 2023
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent biophysical studies of mycobacterial transcription have shed new light on this fundamental process in a group of bacteria that includes deadly pathogens such as

Indexed as

MycobacteriumRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseTranscription, GeneticTuberculosisRNA-Dependent RNA Polymeraseantibioticsbiophysical studiesmycobacterial RNA polymeraseMycobacterium tuberculosistranscription initiation

Identifiers

PMID31880185
PMCPMC7549741
OpenAlexW2996860558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.