Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31880054›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2020

Conservative management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in Denmark: a cohort study.

M Skorstengaard, E Lynge, J Suhr, G Napolitano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M SkorstengaardDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6395-9783
E LyngeNykøbing Falster Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J SuhrDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
G NapolitanoDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Fund for Development of Evidence Based Medicine in Private Specialized Practices 15/869Kraeftens Bekaempelse 130-A8279-15-S38
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAssess the progression, persistence, and regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) after new guidelines on conservative treatment, compared with previous practice.

designNationwide register-based cohort study.

settingDenmark. POPULATION: Women aged 18-44 years diagnosed with CIN2 on biopsy: 6721 in 2008-2011 and 6399 in 2014-2017.

methodsRegister data were retrieved from before (2008-2011) and after (2014-2017) the introduction of new guidelines. Histology diagnoses at second visit were used to assess progression (CIN3+), persistence (CIN2), or regression (CIN1/normal).

main outcome measuresProportion of CIN2 by type of management. Relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for progression, persistence, and regression at second visit in 2014-2017, versus 2008-2011.

resultsThe proportion of CIN2 managed conservatively increased from 29.6% in 2008-2011 to 53.3% in 2014-2017 (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.73-1.89). Time to second visit increased by 2 months. Regression increased from 23.5 to 30.2% (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.36), whereas persistence and progression decreased, from 42.6 to 34.9% (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.86) and from 28.0 to 22.8% (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.86), respectively. In 2008-2011, women managed conservatively had a regression rate of 41.8%, persistence rate of 40.9%, and progression rate of 16.6%. In 2014-2017, these rates were 46.7, 35.5, and 17.1%, respectively.

conclusionAfter implementation of the new guidelines, conservative management became more frequent, and is now used for more than half of women with CIN2. Lesion regression became more frequent, now experienced by 47% of women managed conservatively. Similar regression rates were seen in women younger and older than 30 years, suggesting that conservative management is justifiable for women of childbearing age. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: In Denmark, more than half of women with CIN2 are managed conservatively, and half of these women experience lesion regression.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentAdultCohort StudiesDenmarkDisease ProgressionFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Regression, SpontaneousUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultCervical dysplasiaCIN2conservative managementhistology diagnosesregression potential

Identifiers

PMID31880054
PMCPMC7383715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.