ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020
Evaluation of clinical application of multi-slice computerized tomography in primary retroperitoneal tumors.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Value of anatomical partitioning of the retroperitoneal space in determining the origin of neurogenic tumors.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- A 47-year-old female with primary hepatoid adenocarcinoma in the pelvic retroperitoneum.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- CT Rendering and Radiomic Analysis in Post-Chemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer to Anticipate Difficulties for Young Surgeons.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Evaluation of clinical application of multi-slice computerized tomography in primary retroperitoneal tumors.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo accurately identify primary retroperitoneal tumors by multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) for better treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe common types of 380 cases of primary retroperitoneal tumor, lesion sites, and MSCT features were compared with pathological results. Fisher's or chi-square test approaches have been applied in this study.
resultsMulti-slice computerized tomography multi-directional reconstruction has a high accuracy for primary retroperitoneal tumors (95.7%). Seventy-three liposarcoma cases were located in peri-renal space, accounting for 76.8% (13/95) of the tumors in this region. Meanwhile, 65 cases of neurogenic tumors were located in the paravertebral column, accounting for 90.3% (65/72) of the tumors in this region. MSCT examination could effectively distinguish benign from malignant of primary retroperitoneal tumor (sensitivity = 87.2%, specificity = 82.7%, accuracy rate = 84.5%). Malignant tumors showed more irregularity shape than benign tumor (χ
conclusionThe accuracy of MSCT scan for retroperitoneal tumors is high. Meanwhile, the coincidence rate of qualitative diagnosis before operation and/or before biopsy is also high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.