Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31879830›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2019

Optimization, in-vitro Release and in-vivo Evaluation of Gliquidone Nanoparticles.

Mohamed S Mohamed, Wael A Abdelhafez, Gamal Zayed, Ahmed M Samy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Zaleplon nanospanlastics loaded transdermal patches: formulation, optimization, ex-vivo permeation, and in-vivo studies.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed S MohamedDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt. m.sabre1985@gmail.com.
Wael A AbdelhafezDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt.
Gamal ZayedDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt.
Ahmed M SamyDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Al-Azhar University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present work embarks upon increasing the dissolution rate and the bioavailability of model anti-diabetic drug, gliquidone, a sulfonylurea class drug used for treating diabetes mellitus type 2. The gliquidone nanoparticles were prepared by using anti-solvent precipitation technique in which, gliquidone solution in acetone was added at a controlled rate to an aqueous solution containing polyvinylpyrrolidone K25 (PVP K25) as stabilizer. The effect of drug concentration (X1), polymer concentration (X2) and solvent to anti-solvent ratio (X3) on particle size and dissolution was studied using Box-Behnken design. The results revealed that by decreasing the drug concentration and by increasing the stabilizer concentration and solvent/anti-solvent ratio, reduction in the size of the particles was observed. The mentioned parameters were optimised and particle of size about 175 nm was achieved. The relative dissolution rate of prepared gliquidone nanoparticles in phosphate buffer pH 7.4 was ~ 4.7 times faster than original drug at t = 45 min. Further, the gliquidone nanoparticles were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD). The particles revealed to be oval in shape with stabilizer molecules on surface and exhibited decreased crystalline nature when compared to free gliquidone. Finally, the in vivo studies using gliquidone nanoparticles revealed ~ 2.5-fold increase in Cmax when taken orally in the form of hard gelatin capsules in comparison to free gliquidone. Thus, overall investigation suggests that the developed strategy of gliquidone nanoparticles possess a keen potential for exhibiting anti-diabetic effect.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AvailabilityCalorimetry, Differential ScanningHypoglycemic AgentsIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNanoparticlesPowder DiffractionRabbitsSolubilitySpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredSulfonylurea CompoundsgliquidoneHypoglycemic AgentsSulfonylurea Compoundsantisolvent precipitationBox-Behnken designdissolution efficiencygliquidonenanocrystals

Identifiers

PMID31879830
OpenAlexW2997151678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.