ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2019
Optimization, in-vitro Release and in-vivo Evaluation of Gliquidone Nanoparticles.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Formulation, Optimization and In vivo Evaluation of Freeze-Dried Nanocapsules for Enhancing the Oral Delivery of Valsartan.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Article
- Zaleplon nanospanlastics loaded transdermal patches: formulation, optimization, ex-vivo permeation, and in-vivo studies.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2025Article
- Article
- Tailoring of Rosuvastatin Calcium and Atenolol Bilayer Tablets for the Management of Hyperlipidemia Associated with Hypertension: A Preclinical Study.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Preparation of parenteral nanocrystal suspensions of etoposide from the excipient free dry state of the drug to enhance in vivo antitumoral properties.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present work embarks upon increasing the dissolution rate and the bioavailability of model anti-diabetic drug, gliquidone, a sulfonylurea class drug used for treating diabetes mellitus type 2. The gliquidone nanoparticles were prepared by using anti-solvent precipitation technique in which, gliquidone solution in acetone was added at a controlled rate to an aqueous solution containing polyvinylpyrrolidone K25 (PVP K25) as stabilizer. The effect of drug concentration (X1), polymer concentration (X2) and solvent to anti-solvent ratio (X3) on particle size and dissolution was studied using Box-Behnken design. The results revealed that by decreasing the drug concentration and by increasing the stabilizer concentration and solvent/anti-solvent ratio, reduction in the size of the particles was observed. The mentioned parameters were optimised and particle of size about 175 nm was achieved. The relative dissolution rate of prepared gliquidone nanoparticles in phosphate buffer pH 7.4 was ~ 4.7 times faster than original drug at t = 45 min. Further, the gliquidone nanoparticles were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD). The particles revealed to be oval in shape with stabilizer molecules on surface and exhibited decreased crystalline nature when compared to free gliquidone. Finally, the in vivo studies using gliquidone nanoparticles revealed ~ 2.5-fold increase in Cmax when taken orally in the form of hard gelatin capsules in comparison to free gliquidone. Thus, overall investigation suggests that the developed strategy of gliquidone nanoparticles possess a keen potential for exhibiting anti-diabetic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.