ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019
The performance of diffusive gradient in thin film probes for the long-term monitoring of trace level total mercury in water.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of Diffusive Gradient in Thin-Film Passive Samplers for Predicting Mercury Methylation Potential and Bioaccumulation in Freshwater Wetlands.Environmental science & technology · 2022Article
- Photoactive Titanium Dioxide Films with Embedded Gold Nanoparticles for Quantitative Determination of Mercury Traces in Humic Matter-Containing Freshwaters.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Speciation of Inorganic Compounds in Aquatic Systems Using Diffusive Gradients in Thin-Films: A Review.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The potential of diffusive gradient in thin film (DGT) as a long-term monitoring tool to assess trace level mercury (Hg) in surface waters was evaluated. A piston type DGT sampler and a plate-type device that could hold 15 DGTs were designed. The device contained piston type DGT samplers with varying diffusive gel thicknesses, that is, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 mm, respectively. Three DGT devices were deployed in a lake for 5 weeks, and two were deployed in a stream for 3 weeks. In the lake, the total Hg (THg) mass accumulated in the DGT varied between 0.05 and 0.15 ng, which increased with an increase in deployment time and decreased with an increase in agarose diffusion gel thickness. The DGT concentration in the lake water for a 2 week period was estimated to be about 0.8-1.0 ng/L, which was close to the measured value of 1.1 (± 0.13) ng/L, using the grab sampling technique. However, the DGT estimated at 4 and 6 weeks showed a concentration of about 0.5-0.7 ng/L, which is about twice as small as that measured by grab sampling. This underestimation of the THg levels in water appear to be caused by additional thicknesses of the physical diffusive boundary layer (0.15, 0.5, 1.29 mm) and biofilm, outside the DGT filter. The predicted DGT concentration in the upper stream of the Nakdong River was estimated to be about 0.8-1.4 ng/L, which is similar to the value of 1.22 (± 0.29) ng/L measured in the field by grab sampling. The concentration of THg was estimated to be about 1.0-1.2 ng/L, which is similar to the values measured by grab sampling. The additional diffusion thickness formed outside the DGT filter was 0.018 mm and 0.093 mm at 1 and 3 weeks, respectively, which is not larger than the diffusion gel thickness (0.5-1.0 mm). This was because DGT was installed in a region where the flow velocity is high, and the thickness of the diffusion boundary layer outside the filter is negligible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31879803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.