Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31879732›Full record

ReviewJoints2019

Hip Spacers in Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review of Literature.

Alessandro Rava, Matteo Bruzzone, Umberto Cottino, Emilio Enrietti, Roberto Rossi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Joints, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessandro RavaScuola di Specializzazione in Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6985-1442
Matteo BruzzoneSC Ortopedia e Traumatologia, AO Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Torino, Italy.
Umberto CottinoSC Ortopedia e Traumatologia, AO Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Torino, Italy.
Emilio EnriettiScuola di Specializzazione in Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Roberto RossiSC Ortopedia e Traumatologia, AO Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Torino, Italy.
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a devastating complication with significant consequences for patients. In literature, single and two-stage revision, irrigation and debridement, Girdlestone resection arthroplasty, and arthrodesis and amputation are reported as possible treatments. Recently, two-stage revision has become popular as the gold standard treatment for chronic hip joint infections after THA. In this review, we evaluate the current literature about microbiology of periprosthetic joint infections and the use of antibiotic-loaded cement spacers. We aim to give an overview about indications, clinical results, and mechanical complications for spacers implantation, evaluating also selection criteria, pharmacokinetic properties, and systemic safety of the most frequently used antibiotics.

Indexed as

antibioticantibiotic-loaded spacershipinfectionperiprosthetic joint infections

Identifiers

PMID31879732
PMCPMC6930843
OpenAlexW2979773570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.