Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31879680›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing

Exploring Complicity of Cervical Cancer Screening in Malawi: The Interplay of Behavioral, Cultural, and Societal Influences.

Haeok Lee, Jasintha T Mtengezo, Deogwoon Kim, Mary Sue Makin, Younhee Kang, Address Malata, Joyce Fitzpatrick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mapping Evidence on Management of Cervical Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Haeok LeeCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Jasintha T MtengezoCollege of Nursing, Daeyang University, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Deogwoon KimCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Mary Sue MakinCollege of Nursing, Daeyang University, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Younhee KangCollege of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Address MalataMalawi University of Science and Technology, Malawi.
Joyce FitzpatrickFrances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources · MWUniversity of Massachusetts Boston · USCase Western Reserve University · USEwha Womans University · KRMalawi University of Science and Technology · MW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCervical cancer is preventable, and early diagnosis is possible using low-cost technologies, but a scant number of women receive cancer screening in Malawi. This study aims to identify facilitators and barriers that influence the uptakes of cervical cancer screening behavior in Malawi.

methodsA rapid ethnographic approach with the goal of optimizing planning for a future intervention study was utilized. Data were collected from three focus groups and seven individual interviews with adults in their communities, stakeholders, and health-care providers.

resultsThree categories (sociocultural influences, access to the health-care system, and individual factors) have emerged as facilitators or barriers to cervical cancer screening among Malawian women. The findings also showed that cervical cancer screening behavior is situated socially through cultural and health-care services of a given community.

conclusionsCancer screenings are only sought when illness symptoms persist or worsen. Awareness and knowledge of cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening is low among both health-care providers and the general population. Health-care systems are donor driven and focus on a single disease, health-care access is the greatest challenge to cervical cancer screening, and health-care providers are not adequately prepared to work for rapid increase in the prevalence of cervical cancer. Integrating cervical cancer screening into the existing health-care system is sustainable way forward, and nurses prepared to handle cervical cancer management can play an essential role to promote cervical cancer screening in a health resource-constrained setting.

Indexed as

Behaviorcervical cancer screeningcultureglobal health disparitiesHIVrapid ethnographyresource-limited settingswomen

Identifiers

PMID31879680
PMCPMC6927154
OpenAlexW2996112046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.