Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31879603›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science

Single center experience of managing methanol poisoning in the hilly state of Uttarakhand: A cross sectional study.

Manish Kumar, Nidhi Kaeley, Vempalli Nagasubramanyam, Bharat Bhushan Bhardwaj, Subodh Kumar, Ankita Kabi, Poonam Arora, Mridul Dhar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manish KumarDepartment of General Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Nidhi KaeleyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Vempalli NagasubramanyamDepartment of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Bharat Bhushan BhardwajDepartment of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Subodh KumarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Ankita KabiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Poonam AroraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Mridul DharDepartment of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this article, we describe our experience in managing one of the worst tragedies of an outbreak of methanol poisoning in the state of Uttarakhand in February 2019. It was reported that more than 100 people of Uttarakhand and neighboring districts of Uttar Pradesh succumbed to death after consuming this toxic alcohol laced with methanol. MATERIALS AND

methodsDemographic, clinical, and biochemical data were collected retrospectively from the hospital record section of the tertiary care hospital in the state of Uttarakhand.

resultsNinety-three patients of methanol poisoning were attended by the emergency medicine department of our hospital. The mean age of the patients was 38.9 ± 10.3 years. Majority of the patients were males (92/93). The most common clinical symptoms were gastrointestinal (56; 60.2%) followed by neurological (21; 22.6%) and respiratory (18; 19.3%). Most of the patients presented within 12-24 h after consumption of methanol. The mean of latent time of presentation was 4.8 ± 2.6 h. The mean values of pH, bicarbonate levels, lactate, and base deficit were 7.13 ± 0.6, 12.3 ± 6.4, 2.6 ± 0.8, and 15.6 ± 3.8 mmol/l, respectively. Acute kidney injury (26; 27.9%), blurring of vision (9; 9.6%), and sepsis (6, 6.4%) were common complications. Seven patients (7.5%) succumbed to death. Intensive alkali therapy was the main modality of treatment. Ethanol therapy was useful in patients resistant to alkali therapy. Sixteen (17.2%) patients with acute methanol poisoning were dialyzed once.

conclusionPatients with acute methanol poisoning have varied presentations. Gastrointestinal symptoms are the most common presentation. Such outbreaks account for the heavy toll of mortality and morbidity in the society. Prompt diagnosis and a protocol based treatment can have a significant impact on the outcome of these patients. Thus, public health warning should be immediately issued with initial presentation of the casualties.

Indexed as

Bicarbonatemethanol poisoningUttarakhand

Identifiers

PMID31879603
PMCPMC6927134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.