ArticlePeerJ2019
Characterization and comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genome sequence from
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plastome architecture and maternal relationships of cultivated almond (Prunus dulcis) and its wild relatives.Planta · 2026Article
- Structural analysis of clingstone and freestone peach (Prunus persica L.) plastome genome: provides insight into phylogeny and time diversification.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Comparative Chloroplast Genomics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Chloroplast Genomes of Four Wild Species of the GenusGenes · 2025Article
- Oviposition Preference and Developmental Performance ofInsects · 2024Article
- Review
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023Article
- "Omics" insights into plastid behavior toward improved carotenoid accumulation.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Comparative analysis and phylogenetic investigation of Hong Kong Ilex chloroplast genomes.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Chloroplast Genome Evolution in Four Montane Zingiberaceae Taxa in China.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSweet cherry (
methodsIn this study, we assembled and annotated the complete chloroplast genome of a sweet cherry cultivar
resultsThe complete plastid genome was 157, 886 bp in length with a typical quadripartite structure of LSC (85,990 bp) and SSC (19,080 bp) regions, separated by a pair of IR regions (26,408 bp). It contained 131 genes, including 86 protein-coding genes, 37 transfer RNA genes and 8 ribosomal RNA genes. A total of 77 genes were assigned to three major GO categories, including molecular function, cellular component and biological process categories. Comparison with other
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.