ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Advancing Quality (AQ) hip fracture programme: A large scale programme to improve nutritional assessment in people with hip fractures.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdvancing Quality (AQ) has high reliability and is effective at reducing unwarranted variation in care programme operated by the Advancing Quality Alliance (AQuA). Established in 2008, AQ aims to support NHS healthcare organisations toimprove the reliability of clinical practices so that every patient consistently receives the highest quality care possible, every time. Our work with dedicated clinical teams and managers aims to improve health outcomes for patients and the population whilst reducing unwarranted variation in highly prevalent conditions.
methodsThe population is identified retrospectively using ICD1-0 codes and a standardised data collection tool is used to assess management of people >60 years of age with a HFR, either on arrival to hospital or during their admission.
results7317 patients had a nutritional screen recorded using the MUST score between January 2015 and December 2016. In hospital mortality for patients receiving nutritional screen within 24 h was 6.1% compared to 9.3% for screens after 24 h, p < 0.001 (Fisher's exact test). Mortality rate for those patients without a risk score recorded was 9.4%.The number of patients receiving nutritional screen within 24 h, improved from 86% to 94%.
conclusionInpatient mortality was significantly lower in patients who had their MUST score within 24 h of admission. This is likely attributed to the improvement of the overall package of care if their assessment is performed early in those patients who are admitted to an orthopaedic or neck of femur ward. An early MUST score identifies nutritional deficiency and those at risk allowing measures can be taken to address malnutrition early during the inpatient stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.