Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31879464›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedics

Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision Hip and knee arthroplasty- A review of the literature.

Prabhudev Prasad Purudappa, Om Prakash Sharma, Sruthi Priyavadana, Senthil Sambandam, Jorge A Villafuerte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Unexpected positive culture (UPC) in adults revision spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, risk factors, and management.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Prevalence, interpretation, and management of unexpected positive cultures in revision TKA: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prabhudev Prasad PurudappaBoston VA Medical Centre, 150 S Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Om Prakash SharmaEssentia Health St. Mary's-Detroit Lakes Clinic, 1027 Washington Ave, Detroit Lakes, MN, 56501, USA.
Sruthi Priyavadana43, 3rd Main Road, Lakshmi Nagar, Porur, Chennai, 600116, India.
Senthil SambandamLouis A Johnson VAMC, Clarksburg, WV, 26501, USA.
Jorge A VillafuerteBoston VA Medical Centre, 150 S Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unexpected positive intraoperative culture (UPIC) in revision hip and knee arthroplasty has a prevalence of 10.5%, there is no consensus in the literature on how to interpret them and how to treat them. Our literature review showed that most authors would consider two or more positive cultures as significant and usually treat them with culture specific antibiotics for 4-6 weeks. A single positive intraoperative culture can or cannot be significant depending on the virulence of the organism, hence taking multiple tissue samples in and around the joint is recommended. All failed arthroplasty cases must be evaluated preoperatively according to musculoskeletal infection society criteria (MSIS) to rule out the possibility of infection as an etiology for failure of the arthroplasty. Most authors reported that large majority of these UPIC were from a low virulence organism. Our review showed that the implant survival is more than 85% with 4-6 weeks of antibiotic treatment.

Indexed as

Aseptic failureProsthetic joint infectionRevision arthroplastyUnexpected positive culture

Identifiers

PMID31879464
PMCPMC6919374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.