ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2019
Comparison of success rate of BlockBuster
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomised controlled trial to compare blind intubation success through LMA Blockbuster® and I-Gel® LMA.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2024Trial
- Comparison of the BlockbusterTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Comparison of BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway, King Vision® Video Laryngoscope, and flexible intubation scope for orotracheal intubation in adult patients with simulated immobilised cervical spine: A randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of LMA BlockbusterIndian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Air-Q ILA and LMA Blockbuster Among Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2024Article
- Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Article
- Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized pediatric patients.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2023Article
- Recent advances in airway management.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Two manoeuvres to facilitate the oral insertion of LMA CTrach™.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2020Article
- Comparison of fiberoptic-guided success of intubation using intubating LMA and intubating laryngeal tube suction.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
- To Compare the Postoperative Sore Throat and Hoarseness in Difficult-Airway Adults Undergoing General Anesthesia with or without an Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway Left Over the Endotracheal Tube.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciencesArticle
- Blockbuster laryngeal mask airway as a boon in neonate undergoing ophthalmic surgery.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
- Clinical utility of i-gelInternational journal of critical illness and injury scienceArticle
- Comparison of the LMA BlockBuster and intubating LMA as a conduit to blind tracheal intubation.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
- Clinical Performance of I-gelInternational journal of applied & basic medical researchArticle
- Use of Blockbuster® LMA in a pediatric patient with cleft palate for laparoscopic surgery.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
- Comparison of blind oro-tracheal intubation through LMA Blockbuster and LMA Protector - A prospective randomized study.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsBlockBuster
methodsSixty patients of age group 20-60 years undergoing general anaesthesia were randomised in 2 groups, of 30 patients each, for tracheal intubation using either BlockBuster
resultsThe first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation was 90% in Group B and 66.6% in Group F (
conclusionBlockBuster
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.