Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31879324›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2021

Standardized monitoring of cytomegalovirus-specific immunity can improve risk stratification of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Eva Wagner-Drouet, Daniel Teschner, Christine Wolschke, Dietlinde Janson, Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart, Johannes Gärtner, Stephan Mielke, Martin Schreder, Guido Kobbe, Mustafa Kondakci and 19 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02156479 (Clinical Validation of an Improved T-Track® CMV Assay to Assess the Functionality of CMV Protein-reactive Cell-mediated Immunity), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02156479 completednot on this map

Clinical Validation of an Improved T-Track® CMV Assay to Assess the Functionality of CMV Protein-reactive Cell-mediated Immunity (CMI) and Its Suitability to Determine a Protective Cut-off Value for Recurrent CMV Reactivations in Allo-HSCT Recipients

TypeobservationalSponsorLophius Biosciences GmbHRan2014 to 2018Enrolled175ConditionsCytomegalovirus Infection, GVHD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cytomegalovirus in the transplant setting: Where are we now and what happens next? A report from the International CMV Symposium 2021.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 14 institutions in 3 countries.

Eva Wagner-DrouetDpt of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Pneumology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Daniel TeschnerDpt of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Pneumology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Christine WolschkeDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Dietlinde JansonDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Kerstin Schäfer-EckartOncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Klinikum Nord, Nürnberg, Germany.
Johannes GärtnerOncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Klinikum Nord, Nürnberg, Germany.
Stephan MielkeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin SchrederFirst Department of Medicine, Center for Oncology and Hematology, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria.
Guido KobbeDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mustafa KondakciDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Inken HilgendorfKlinik f. Innere Medizin II, Abt. Haematol. und Internist. Onkologie, Univ.-Klinikum Jena, Germany.
Marie von Lilienfeld-ToalKlinik f. Innere Medizin II, Abt. Haemmatol. und Internist. Onkologie, Univ.-Klinikum Jena, Germany.
Stefan KleinDpt of Hematology and Oncology, Univ. Medical Center Mannheim, Univ. of Heidelberg, Mannheim,Germany.
Daniela HeidenreichDpt of Hematology and Oncology, Univ. Medical Center Mannheim, Univ. of Heidelberg, Mannheim,Germany.
Sebastian KreilDpt of Hematology and Oncology, Univ. Medical Center Mannheim, Univ. of Heidelberg, Mannheim,Germany.
Mareike VerbeekIII. Medical Department, Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM, Munich, Germany.
Sandra GrassIII. Medical Department, Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM, Munich, Germany.
Markus DitschkowskiInnere Klinik, Tumorforschung, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
Tanja GromkeInnere Klinik, Tumorforschung, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
Martina KochDpt of Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center of the JGU, Mainz, Germany.
Monika LindemannInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
Thomas HünigInstitute of Virology and Immunobiology, University Medical Center Würzburg, Germany.
Traudel SchmidtLophius Biosciences, Regensburg, Germany.
Anne RascleLophius Biosciences, Regensburg, Germany.
Harald GuldanLophius Biosciences, Regensburg, Germany.
Sascha BarabasLophius Biosciences, Regensburg, Germany.
Ludwig DemlLophius Biosciences, Regensburg, Germany.
Ralf WagnerInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
Daniel WolffDpt of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
Lophius Biosciences (Germany) · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim · DEEssen University Hospital · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DENuremberg Hospital · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEWilhelminen Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrence of cytomegalovirus reactivation remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity using a standardized assay might improve the risk stratification of patients. A prospective multicenter study was conducted in 175 intermediate- and high-risk allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients under preemptive antiviral therapy. Cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity was measured using a standardized IFN-γ ELISpot assay (T-Track® CMV). Primary aim was to evaluate the suitability of measuring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity after end of treatment for a first cytomegalovirus reactivation to predict recurrent reactivation. 40/101 (39.6%) patients with a first cytomegalovirus reactivation experienced recurrent reactivations, mainly in the high-risk group (cytomegalovirus-seronegative donor/cytomegalovirus-seropositive recipient). The positive predictive value of T-Track® CMV (patients with a negative test after the first reactivation experienced at least one recurrent reactivation) was 84.2% in high-risk patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a higher probability of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation in high-risk patients with a negative test after the first reactivation (hazard ratio 2.73; p=0.007). Interestingly, a post-hoc analysis considering T-Track® CMV measurements at day 100 post-transplantation, a time point highly relevant for outpatient care, showed a positive predictive value of 90.0% in high-risk patients. Our results indicate that standardized cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity monitoring may allow improved risk stratification and management of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02156479.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationCytomegalovirusHumansProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentVirus Activation

Identifiers

PMID31879324
PMCPMC7849569
OpenAlexW2998544205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.