Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31879268›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2020

Mechanical and finite element evaluation of a bioprinted scaffold following recellularization in a rat subcutaneous model.

Christopher Noble, Eva L Maxson, Amir Lerman, Melissa D Young

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Evaluation of the role of peripheral artery plaque geometry and composition on stent performance.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher NobleDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Eva L MaxsonDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Amir LermanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Melissa D YoungDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: young.melissa@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Automated patient specific artery modeling using ultrasound virtual histologyR01EB018965 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI YOUNG, MELISSA DENTON · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB018965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineered heart valves (TEHV) provide several advantages over currently available aortic heart valve replacements. Bioprinting provides a patient-specific means of developing a TEHV scaffold from imaging data, and the capability to embed the patient's own cells within the scaffold. In this work we investigated the remodeling capacity of a collagen-based bio-ink by implanting bioprinted disks in a rat subcutaneous model for 2, 4 and 12 weeks and evaluating the mechanical response using biaxial testing and subsequent finite element (FE) modeling. Samples explanted after 2 and 4 weeks showed inferior mechanical properties compared to native tissues while 12 week explants showed a mechanical response of similar magnitude but did not demonstrate the anisotropy present in native tissues. In the FE analysis, the model utilizing mechanical properties from samples explanted after 12 weeks showed the closest mechanical behavior to the native tissues. However, in diastole native tissues showed higher stress in the leaflet belly and lower strain at the commissures compared to 12 week explants, likely due to the anisotropy present in the native tissues. Thus, either further remodeling is required in situ in the aortic valve position or by in vitro preconditioning in an environment such as a bioreactor. Regardless, these results demonstrate the utility of FE analysis to optimize bioprinting process parameters for the most favorable in vivo mechanical performance.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveBioprintingHeart Valve ProsthesisTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsAnisotropyCollagenFinite Element AnalysisRatsStress, MechanicalTissue EngineeringCollagenBiaixal testingBioprintingFinite element analysisHeart valveTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID31879268
PMCPMC7210052
OpenAlexW2983154729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.