Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31878897›Full record

SynthesisBMC neurology2019

Association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms and the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS): an updated meta-analysis.

Danyal Imani, Bahman Razi, Morteza Motallebnezhad, Ramazan Rezaei

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. The Role of Vitamin D in Autoimmune Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. The Link BetweenBioMed research international · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Oman medical journal · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Danyal ImaniDepartment of Immunology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences(TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Bahman RaziDepartment of Hematology and Blood Banking, School of Medicine, Tarbiat modares university (TMU), Tehran, Iran.
Morteza MotallebnezhadImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ramazan RezaeiDepartment of Immunology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 14194, Iran. ramin.rezaei25@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-7238
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Beheshti University · IRTarbiat Modares University · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between the Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) gene polymorphism and the risk of Multiple sclerosis (MS) has been evaluated in several researches. However, the findings were inconsistent and inconclusive. Therefore, we set out a meta-analysis of all eligible published case-control studies to obtain an exact evaluation of the association between VDR gene polymorphisms and MS.

methodAll relevant studies reporting the association between the VDR gene FokI (rs2228570), or/and TaqI (rs731236) or/and BsmI (rs1544410) or/and ApaI (rs7975232) polymorphisms and susceptibility to MS published up to May, 2019 were identified by comprehensive systematic search in the electronic database of web of science, Scopus, and PubMed. After that, the strength of association between VDR gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to MS was evaluated by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsA total of 30 case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall results suggested a significant association between TaqI polymorphism and MS risk under heterozygote genetic model (OR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.01-1.59, random effect). Moreover, the pooled results of subgroup analysis declined presence of significant association under all defined genetic model. In subgroup analysis, BsmI polymorphisms was associated with increased risk of MS under recessive model in Asian populations. On the other hand, ApaI polymorphism was associated with decreased risk of MS under recessive and aa vs. AA model in Asian populations.

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggested a significant association between TaqI polymorphism and MS susceptibility. Furthermore, BsmI polymorphism was associated with increased risk of MS in Asian populations. In contrast, ApaI polymorphism was associated with decreased risk of MS in Asian populations. Future large-scale studies on gene-environment and gene-gene interactions are required to estimate risk factors and assist early diagnosis of patients at high risk for MS.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMultiple SclerosisOdds RatioPolymorphism, GeneticReceptors, CalcitriolRisk FactorsReceptors, CalcitriolVDR protein, humanMeta-analysisMultiple sclerosisPolymorphismVitamin D receptor

Identifiers

PMID31878897
PMCPMC6933912
OpenAlexW2996799390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.