Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31878894›Full record

Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2019

1g versus 2 g daily intravenous ceftriaxone in the treatment of community onset pneumonia - a propensity score analysis of data from a Japanese multicenter registry.

Shinya Hasegawa, Ryuichi Sada, Makito Yaegashi, Konosuke Morimoto, Takahiro Mori, Adult Pneumonia Study Group-Japan

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ceftriaxone 1 g Versus 2 g Daily for the Treatment of Enterobacterales Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shinya HasegawaDepartment of Infectious Disease, Tokyo Metro Tama Medical Center, 2-8-29 Musashidai, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-8524, Japan.
Ryuichi SadaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan.
Makito YaegashiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan.
Konosuke MorimotoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, 1-14 Bunkyo-cho, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8521, Japan.
Takahiro MoriDepartment of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tenno-dai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan. takahiromori@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0216-2284
Adult Pneumonia Study Group-Japan
Kameda Medical Center · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPTenri Hospital · JPTokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-onset pneumonia (COP) is a combined concept of community acquired pneumonia and the previous classification of healthcare-associated pneumonia. Although ceftriaxone (CRO) is one of the treatment choices for COP, it is unclear whether 1 or 2 g CRO daily has better efficacy. We compared the effectiveness of 1 g with 2 g of CRO for COP treatment. We hypothesized that 1 g CRO would show non-inferiority over 2 g CRO.

methodsThis study was an analysis of prospectively registered data of the patients with COP from four Japanese hospitals (the Adult Pneumonia Study Group-Japan: APSG-J). We included subjects who were initially treated solely with 1 or 2 g of CRO. The propensity score was estimated from the 33 pre-treatment variables, including age, sex, weight, pre-existing comorbidities, prescribed drugs, risk factors for aspiration pneumonia, vital signs, laboratory data, and a finding from chest xrays. The primary endpoint was the cure rate, for which a non-inferiority analysis was performed with a margin of 0.05. In addition, we performed three sensitivity analyses; using data limited to the group in which CRO solely was used until the completion of treatment, using data limited to inpatient cases, and performing a generalized linear mixed-effect logistic regression analysis to assess the primary outcome after adjusting for random hospital effects.

resultsOf the 3817 adult subjects with pneumonia who were registered in the APSG-J study, 290 and 216 were initially treated solely with 1 or 2 g of CRO, respectively. Propensity score matching was used to extract 175 subjects in each group. The cure rate was 94.6 and 93.1% in the 1 and 2 g CRO groups, respectively (risk difference 1.5%; 95% confidence interval - 3.1 to 6.0; p = 0.009 for non-inferiority). The results of the sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary result.

conclusionsThe propensity score-matched analysis of multicenter cohort data from Japan revealed that the cure rate for COP patients treated with 1 g daily CRO was non-inferior to that of patients treated with 2 g daily CRO.

Indexed as

RegistriesAdministration, IntravenousAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneCohort StudiesCommunity-Acquired InfectionsFemaleHumansJapanKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMalePneumoniaPropensity ScoreAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneCeftriaxoneCommunity-acquired pneumoniaCommunity-onset pneumoniaCure rateNon-inferiority

Identifiers

PMID31878894
PMCPMC6933656
OpenAlexW2998620076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.