Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31878889›Full record

Observational studyBMC nephrology2019

Evaluation of long-term intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections on renal function in patients with and without diabetic kidney disease.

Rachael Ann O'Neill, Patrick Gallagher, Tricia Douglas, Julie-Anne Little, Alexander Peter Maxwell, Giuliana Silvestri, Gareth McKay

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachael Ann O'NeillCentre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Patrick GallagherCentre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Tricia DouglasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Julie-Anne LittleOptometry & Vision Science Research Group, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Alexander Peter MaxwellCentre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Giuliana SilvestriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Gareth McKayCentre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK. g.j.mckay@qub.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8197-6280

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_15025Medical Research Council MR/K003364/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdministering anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) by intraocular injection has been shown to have a safe systemic profile. Nevertheless, incidents of acute kidney injury following anti-VEGF injection have been reported. We assessed the long-term effect of multiple intravitreal anti-VEGF injections on measures of renal function in patients with diabetes including rate of change of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR).

methodsA retrospective review of patients receiving diabetic macular oedema (DMO) treatment was undertaken. Serum creatinine, ACR, number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and clinical characteristics were collected from electronic healthcare records (EHR). A co-efficient of eGFR and ACR change with time was calculated over a mean duration of 2.6 years. Regression modelling was used to assess variation in the number of anti-VEGF injections and change in eGFR and ACR.

resultsThe EHR of 85 patients with DMO (59% male, 78% type 2 diabetes mellitus [T2DM]) were reviewed. On average, 26.8 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections were given per patient over a mean duration of 31 months. No association between increasing number of anti-VEGF injections and rate of eGFR decline (beta = 0.04, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: - 0.02, 0.09; p = 0.22) or ACR change over time (beta = 0.02, CI: - 0.19, 0.23; p = 0.86) was detected, following adjustment for hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, T2DM, and medications taken.

conclusionOur data suggests regular long-term intravitreal VEGF inhibition does not significantly alter the rate of change in eGFR and/or ACR with increasing number of treatment injections.

Indexed as

AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsCohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesFemaleGlomerular Filtration BarrierHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMacular EdemaMaleRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRetrospective StudiesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanDiabetic macular oedemaIntravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factorRenal function

Identifiers

PMID31878889
PMCPMC6933625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.