ArticleOptics express2019
Noise and sensitivity in optical coherence tomography based vibrometry.
Article in Optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D-motion mapping of the malleus-incus complex using a robot-mounted optical coherence tomography vibrometry system.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Multimodal microscope for optical coherence microscopy, tomography, vibrometry, and two-photon microscopy in the living mouse cochlea.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Electronic frequency shifting enables long, variable working distance optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Unloading outer hair cell bundles in vivo does not yield evidence of spontaneous oscillations in the mouse cochlea.Hearing research · 2022Article
- Interplay between traveling wave propagation and amplification at the apex of the mouse cochlea.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Light-adapted flicker optoretinograms captured with a spatio-temporal optical coherence-tomography (STOC-T) system.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Vector of motion measurements in the living cochlea using a 3D OCT vibrometry system.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- In vivo functional imaging of the human middle ear with a hand-held optical coherence tomography device.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Cochlear supporting cells require GAS2 for cytoskeletal architecture and hearing.Developmental cell · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There is growing interest in using the exquisite phase sensitivity of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to measure the vibratory response in organ systems such as the middle and inner ear. Using frequency domain analysis, it is possible to achieve picometer sensitivity to vibration over a wide frequency band. Here we explore the limits of the frequency domain vibratory sensitivity due to additive noise and consider the implication of phase noise statistics on the estimation of vibratory amplitude and phase. Noise statistics are derived in both the Rayleigh (s/n = 0) and Normal distribution (s/n > 3) limits. These theoretical findings are explored using simulation and verified with experiments using a swept-laser system and a piezo electric element. A metric for sensitivity is proposed based on the 98% confidence interval for the Rayleigh distribution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.