Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31878274›Full record

ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2019

ZeOncoTest: Refining and Automating the Zebrafish Xenograft Model for Drug Discovery in Cancer.

Carles Cornet, Sylvia Dyballa, Javier Terriente, Valeria Di Giacomo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Zebrafish-An Optimal Model in Experimental Oncology.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Benefits of Zebrafish Xenograft Models in Cancer Research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carles CornetZeClinics SL, IGTP Edifici Muntanya (c/de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles s/n; 08916 BDN, Lab P0-8), 08916 Barcelona, Spain.
Sylvia DyballaZeClinics SL, IGTP Edifici Muntanya (c/de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles s/n; 08916 BDN, Lab P0-8), 08916 Barcelona, Spain.
Javier TerrienteZeClinics SL, IGTP Edifici Muntanya (c/de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles s/n; 08916 BDN, Lab P0-8), 08916 Barcelona, Spain.
Valeria Di GiacomoZeClinics SL, IGTP Edifici Muntanya (c/de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles s/n; 08916 BDN, Lab P0-8), 08916 Barcelona, Spain.
ZeClinics (Spain) · ES

Funding

Horizon 2020 755988Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness DI-14-06969Torres Quevedo fellowship PTQ-07220Torres Quevedo Fellowship PTQ-15-07995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The xenograft of human cancer cells in model animals is a powerful tool for understanding tumor progression and metastatic potential. Mice represent a validated host, but their use is limited by the elevated experimental costs and low throughput. To overcome these restrictions, zebrafish larvae might represent a valuable alternative. Their small size and transparency allow the tracking of transplanted cells. Therefore, tumor growth and early steps of metastasis, which are difficult to evaluate in mice, can be addressed. In spite of its advantages, the use of this model has been hindered by lack of experimental homogeneity and validation. Considering these facts, the aim of our work was to standardize, automate, and validate a zebrafish larvae xenograft assay with increased translatability and higher drug screening throughput. The ZeOncoTest reliability is based on the optimization of different experimental parameters, such as cell labeling, injection site, automated individual sample image acquisition, and analysis. This workflow implementation finally allows a higher precision and experimental throughput increase, when compared to previous reports. The approach was validated with the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231, the colorectal cancer cells HCT116, and the prostate cancer cells PC3; and known drugs, respectively RKI-1447, Docetaxel, and Mitoxantrone. The results recapitulate growth and invasion for all tested tumor cells, along with expected efficacy of the compounds. Finally, the methodology has proven useful for understanding specific drugs mode of action. The insights gained bring a step further for zebrafish larvae xenografts to enter the regulated preclinical drug discovery path.

Indexed as

automationcancerdrug discoverythroughputxenograftzebrafish larvae

Identifiers

PMID31878274
PMCPMC7169390
OpenAlexW2997378426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.