ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2019
ZeOncoTest: Refining and Automating the Zebrafish Xenograft Model for Drug Discovery in Cancer.
Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Zebrafish tumor xenograft models for drug-screening: a systematic review of methods for treatment assessment.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Pooled it
- In Vivo Prostate Cancer Modelling: From the Pre-Clinical to the Clinical Setting.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Zebrafish Xenograft Model for Predicting Cisplatin Efficacy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Cancer science · 2025Article
- The Effect of Bee Venom and Melittin on Glioblastoma Cells in Zebrafish Model.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Narrative Review of Patient Cancer Tissue-Derived Zebrafish Xenograft Models for Evaluating Drug Sensitivity as an Avatar Model for Clinical Application.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- A dual readout embryonic zebrafish xenograft model of rhabdomyosarcoma to assess clinically relevant multi-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Xenografting Human Musculoskeletal Sarcomas in Mice, Chick Embryo, and Zebrafish: How to Boost Translational Research.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Furan-based Chalcone Annihilates the Multi-Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Protects Zebra Fish Against its Infection.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024Article
- Zebrafish xenograft as a tool for the study of colorectal cancer: a review.Cell death & disease · 2024Review
- Refined high-content imaging-based phenotypic drug screening in zebrafish xenografts.NPJ precision oncology · 2023Review
- Zebrafish-An Optimal Model in Experimental Oncology.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- In Vivo Modeling of Human Breast Cancer Using Cell Line and Patient-Derived Xenografts.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2022Review
- What Zebrafish and Nanotechnology Can Offer for Cancer Treatments in the Age of Personalized Medicine.Cancers · 2022Review
- Aggressiveness and Metastatic Potential of Breast Cancer Cells Co-Cultured with Preadipocytes and Exposed to an Environmental Pollutant Dioxin: AnEnvironmental health perspectives · 2021Article
- Benefits of Zebrafish Xenograft Models in Cancer Research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The xenograft of human cancer cells in model animals is a powerful tool for understanding tumor progression and metastatic potential. Mice represent a validated host, but their use is limited by the elevated experimental costs and low throughput. To overcome these restrictions, zebrafish larvae might represent a valuable alternative. Their small size and transparency allow the tracking of transplanted cells. Therefore, tumor growth and early steps of metastasis, which are difficult to evaluate in mice, can be addressed. In spite of its advantages, the use of this model has been hindered by lack of experimental homogeneity and validation. Considering these facts, the aim of our work was to standardize, automate, and validate a zebrafish larvae xenograft assay with increased translatability and higher drug screening throughput. The ZeOncoTest reliability is based on the optimization of different experimental parameters, such as cell labeling, injection site, automated individual sample image acquisition, and analysis. This workflow implementation finally allows a higher precision and experimental throughput increase, when compared to previous reports. The approach was validated with the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231, the colorectal cancer cells HCT116, and the prostate cancer cells PC3; and known drugs, respectively RKI-1447, Docetaxel, and Mitoxantrone. The results recapitulate growth and invasion for all tested tumor cells, along with expected efficacy of the compounds. Finally, the methodology has proven useful for understanding specific drugs mode of action. The insights gained bring a step further for zebrafish larvae xenografts to enter the regulated preclinical drug discovery path.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.