Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31878085›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Assessing the Psychological Priorities for Optimising Captive Asian Elephant (

Jake Stuart Veasey

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Behaviour, Furnishing and Vertical Space Use of Captive Callimico (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Improving welfare assessment in aquaculture.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Supporting Zoo Asian Elephant (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Public Feeding Interactions as Enrichment for Three Zoo-Housed Elephants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jake Stuart VeaseySchool of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Southwell NG25 0QF, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The welfare status of elephants under human care has been a contentious issue for two decades or more in numerous western countries. Much effort has gone into assessing the welfare of captive elephants at individual and population levels with little consensus having been achieved in relation to both the welfare requirements of captive elephants, or their absolute welfare status. A methodology capable of identifying the psychological priorities of elephants would greatly assist in both managing and assessing captive elephant welfare. Here, a Delphi-based Animal Welfare Priority Identification System

Indexed as

animal welfareappetitiveAsian elephantAWPIS©behavioural needscognitionmotivationpsychological prioritieszoo

Identifiers

PMID31878085
PMCPMC7022842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.