Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31878077›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Vitamin and Mineral Supplementation Practices in Preterm Infants: A Survey of Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Intensive and Special Care Units.

Colleen Oliver, Caitlin Watson, Elesa Crowley, Melissa Gilroy, Denise Page, Katrina Weber, Deanna Messina, Barbara Cormack

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Extraction of bioactive compounds fromJournal of food science and technology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. [Expert consensus on enteral nutrition management of preterm infants (2024)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Colleen OliverDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.
Caitlin WatsonDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia.
Elesa CrowleyFaculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle Department of Rural Health, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia.
Melissa GilroyDepartment of Dietetics and Food Services, Mater Group, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.
Denise PageDepartment of Dietetics and Food Services, Mater Group, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.
Katrina WeberDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA 6150, Australia.
Deanna MessinaDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA 6150, Australia.
Barbara CormackDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, Starship Child Health, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Fiona Stanley Hospital · AUMater Health Services · AUMonash Children’s Hospital · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUTamworth Hospital · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm infants are at increased risk of micronutrient deficiencies as a result of low body stores, maternal deficiencies, and inadequate supplementations. The aim of this survey was to investigate current vitamin and mineral supplementation practices and compare these with published recommendations and available evidence on dosages and long-term outcomes of supplementations in preterm infants. In 2018, a two-part electronic survey was emailed to 50 Australasian Neonatal Dietitians Network (ANDiN) member and nonmember dietitians working in neonatal units in Australia and New Zealand. For inpatients, all units prescribed between 400 and 500 IU/day vitamin D, compared to a recommended intake range of 400-1000 IU/day. Two units prescribed 900-1000 IU/day at discharge. For iron, 83% of respondents prescribed within the recommended intake range of 2-3 mg/kg/day for inpatients. Up to 10% of units prescribed 6 mg/kg/day for inpatients and at discharge. More than one-third of units reported routine supplementations of other micronutrients, including calcium, phosphate, vitamin E, and folic acid. There was significant variation between neonatal units in vitamin and mineral supplementation practices, which may contribute to certain micronutrient intakes above or below recommended ranges for gestational ages or birth weights. The variations in practice are in part due to differences in recommended vitamin and mineral intakes between expert groups and a lack of evidence supporting the recommendations for supplementations.

Indexed as

Health Care SurveysAustraliaCalcium, DietaryDietary SupplementsFolic AcidHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care, NeonatalIron, DietaryMicronutrientsMineralsNew ZealandNutritionistsRecommended Dietary AllowancesVitamin DCalcium, DietaryFolic AcidIron, DietaryMicronutrientsMineralsVitamin DVitamin EVitaminsmineralneonatalpretermsupplementationsvitamin

Identifiers

PMID31878077
PMCPMC7019934
OpenAlexW2995605785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.