Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31878065›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Tackling Faults in the Industry 4.0 Era-A Survey of Machine-Learning Solutions and Key Aspects.

Angelos Angelopoulos, Emmanouel T Michailidis, Nikolaos Nomikos, Panagiotis Trakadas, Antonis Hatziefremidis, Stamatis Voliotis, Theodore Zahariadis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angelos AngelopoulosGeneral Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 34400 Thesi skliro, Psahna, Evia, Greece.
Emmanouel T MichailidisTelecommunications, Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (TelSiP) Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, School of Engineering, University of West Attica, Ancient Olive Grove Campus, 12244 Aigaleo, Greece.
Nikolaos NomikosDepartment of Information and Communication Systems Engineering, School of Engineering, University of the Aegean, 83200 Samos, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9210-9796
Panagiotis TrakadasGeneral Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 34400 Thesi skliro, Psahna, Evia, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5146-5954
Antonis HatziefremidisGeneral Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 34400 Thesi skliro, Psahna, Evia, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-6641
Stamatis VoliotisGeneral Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 34400 Thesi skliro, Psahna, Evia, Greece.
Theodore ZahariadisGeneral Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 34400 Thesi skliro, Psahna, Evia, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent advancements in the fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have affected several research fields, leading to improvements that could not have been possible with conventional optimization techniques. Among the sectors where AI/ML enables a plethora of opportunities, industrial manufacturing can expect significant gains from the increased process automation. At the same time, the introduction of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), providing improved wireless connectivity for real-time manufacturing data collection and processing, has resulted in the culmination of the fourth industrial revolution, also known as Industry 4.0. In this survey, we focus on the vital processes of fault detection, prediction and prevention in Industry 4.0 and present recent developments in ML-based solutions. We start by examining various proposed cloud/fog/edge architectures, highlighting their importance for acquiring manufacturing data in order to train the ML algorithms. In addition, as faults might also occur from sources beyond machine degradation, the potential of ML in safeguarding cyber-security is thoroughly discussed. Moreover, a major concern in the Industry 4.0 ecosystem is the role of human operators and workers. Towards this end, a detailed overview of ML-based human-machine interaction techniques is provided, allowing humans to be in-the-loop of the manufacturing processes in a symbiotic manner with minimal errors. Finally, open issues in these relevant fields are given, stimulating further research.

Indexed as

anomaly detectionfault detectionhuman–machine interactionIndustry 4.0machine learningpredictive maintenancesecurity

Identifiers

PMID31878065
PMCPMC6983262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.