ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional mechanism and clinical implications of lncRNA NEAT1 in traumatic fractures and their correlation with delayed healing.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Sensor-integrated hip and knee prostheses: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Harmonic Vibration Analysis in a Simplified Model for Monitoring Transfemoral Implant Loosening.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A millimetre-scale capacitive biosensing and biophysical stimulation system for emerging bioelectronic bone implants.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Detection of Total Hip Replacement Loosening Based on Structure-Borne Sound: Influence of the Position of the Sensor on the Hip Stem.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The application of impantable sensors in the musculoskeletal system: a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Bioelectronic multifunctional bone implants: recent trends.Bioelectronic medicine · 2022Review
- Multiscale Sensing of Bone-Implant Loosening for Multifunctional Smart Bone Implants: Using Capacitive Technologies for Precision Controllability.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Multifunctional Smart Bone Implants: Fiction or Future?-A New Perspective.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Capacitive interdigitated system of high osteoinductive/conductive performance for personalized acting-sensing implants.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2021Article
- Non-invasive early detection of failure modes in total hip replacements (THR) via acoustic emission (AE).Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2021Article
- Towards an effective sensing technology to monitor micro-scale interface loosening of bioelectronic implants.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Evolution of drug-eluting biomedical implants for sustained drug delivery.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Musculoskeletal disorders are becoming an ever-growing societal burden and, as a result, millions of bone replacements surgeries are performed per year worldwide. Despite total joint replacements being recognized among the most successful surgeries of the last century, implant failure rates exceeding 10% are still reported. These numbers highlight the necessity of technologies to provide an accurate monitoring of the bone-implant interface state. This study provides a detailed review of the most relevant methodologies and technologies already proposed to monitor the loosening states of endoprosthetic implants, as well as their performance and experimental validation. A total of forty-two papers describing both intracorporeal and extracorporeal technologies for cemented or cementless fixation were thoroughly analyzed. Thirty-eight technologies were identified, which are categorized into five methodologies: vibrometric, acoustic, bioelectric impedance, magnetic induction, and strain. Research efforts were mainly focused on vibrometric and acoustic technologies. Differently, approaches based on bioelectric impedance, magnetic induction and strain have been less explored. Although most technologies are noninvasive and are able to monitor different loosening stages of endoprosthetic implants, they are not able to provide effective monitoring during daily living of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.