Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31878010›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Biodegradation of Organophosphorus Compounds Predicted by Enzymatic Process Using Molecular Modelling and Observed in Soil Samples Through Analytical Techniques and Microbiological Analysis: A Comparison.

Monique Cardozo, Joyce S F D de Almeida, Samir F de A Cavalcante, Jacqueline R S Salgado, Arlan S Gonçalves, Tanos C C França, Kamil Kuca, Humberto R Bizzo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Strategies for EnhancingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Monique CardozoNatural Products Research Institute (IPPN), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), CCS, Bloco H, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil.
Joyce S F D de AlmeidaLaboratory of Molecular Modeling Applied to Chemical and Biological Defense (LMACBD) Military Institute of Engineering (IME), Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1426-6681
Samir F de A CavalcanteNatural Products Research Institute (IPPN), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), CCS, Bloco H, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3478-2747
Jacqueline R S SalgadoInstitute of CBRN Defense (IDQBRN), Avenida das Américas 28705, Rio de Janeiro 23020-470, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4664-9222
Arlan S GonçalvesFederal Institute of Education, Science and Technology, Avenida Ministro Salgado Filho, 1000, Soteco, Vila Velha 29106-010, Espírito Santo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5965-3191
Tanos C C FrançaLaboratory of Molecular Modeling Applied to Chemical and Biological Defense (LMACBD) Military Institute of Engineering (IME), Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil.
Kamil KucaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9664-1109
Humberto R BizzoNatural Products Research Institute (IPPN), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), CCS, Bloco H, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5370-6478
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRMilitary Institute of Engineering · BRUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BRUniversity of Hradec Králové · CZ

Funding

Brazilian Army Military Institute of Engineering and Chemical, Biological, Nuclear and Radiological Defense InstituteCAPES Grant No. PD 1782/2008CNPq Grants No. 304557/2012-9 and 308225/2018-0FAPERJ Grants No. E-26/102.993/2012 and E-02/202.961/2017OPCW "Research Projects Supports Programme" L/ICA/ICB/201062/15UHK Excelence project PřF UHK 2212/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organophosphorus compounds (OP) are chemicals widely used as pesticides in different applications such as agriculture and public health (vector control), and some of the highly toxic forms have been used as chemical weapons. After application of OPs in an environment, they persist for a period, suffering a degradation process where the biotic factors are considered the most relevant forms. However, to date, the biodegradation of OP compounds is not well understood. There are a plenty of structure-based biodegradation estimation methods, but none of them consider enzymatic interaction in predicting and better comprehending the differences in the fate of OPs in the environment. It is well known that enzymatic processes are the most relevant processes in biodegradation, and that hydrolysis is the main pathway in the natural elimination of OPs in soil samples. Due to this, we carried out theoretical studies in order to investigate the interactions of these OPs with a chosen enzyme-the phosphotriesterase. This one is characteristic of some soils' microorganisms, and has been identified as a key player in many biodegradation processes, thanks to its capability for fast hydrolyzing of different OPs. In parallel, we conducted an experiment using native soil in two conditions, sterilized and not sterilized, spiked with specific amounts of two OPs with similar structure-paraoxon-ethyl (PXN) and O-(4-nitrophenyl) O-ethyl methylphosphonate (NEMP). The amount of OP present in the samples and the appearance of characteristic hydrolysis products were periodically monitored for 40 days using analytical techniques. Moreover, the number of microorganisms present was obtained with plate cell count. Our theoretical results were similar to what was achieved in experimental analysis. Parameters calculated by enzymatic hydrolysis were better for PXN than for NEMP. In soil, PXN suffered a faster hydrolysis than NEMP, and the cell count for PXN was higher than for NEMP, highlighting the higher microbiological toxicity of the latter. All these results pointed out that theoretical study can offer a better comprehension of the possible mechanisms involved in real biodegradation processes, showing potential in exploring how biodegradation of OPs relates with enzymatic interactions.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalAgricultureChemical WarfareHumansHydrolysisInsecticidesOrganophosphorus CompoundsParaoxonPesticidesPublic HealthPyrrolidinesSoilethylparaoxonInsecticidesN-ethylmercapto-3-4-dihydroxy-2-hydroxymethylpyrrolidineOrganophosphorus CompoundsParaoxonPesticidesPyrrolidinesSoilbioremediationmolecular modelingorganophosphorus compoundsphosphotriesterase

Identifiers

PMID31878010
PMCPMC6982719
OpenAlexW2996446616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.