Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31877894›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Specificity Assessment of CRISPR Genome Editing of Oncogenic EGFR Point Mutation with Single-Base Differences.

Taegeun Bae, Hanseop Kim, Jeong Hee Kim, Yong Jun Kim, Seung Hwan Lee, Byung-Joo Ham, Junho K Hur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Taegeun BaeDepartment of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea.
Hanseop KimNational Primate Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Cheongju 28116, Korea.
Jeong Hee KimDepartment of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea.
Yong Jun KimDepartment of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5374-712X
Seung Hwan LeeNational Primate Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Cheongju 28116, Korea.
Byung-Joo HamDepartment of Psychiatry, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0108-2058
Junho K HurDepartment of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3794-1149
Kyung Hee University · KRKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology · KRKorea University · KR

Funding

national research foundation of Korea NRF-2017R1E1A1A01074529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In CRISPR genome editing, CRISPR proteins form ribonucleoprotein complexes with guide RNAs to bind and cleave the target DNAs with complete sequence complementarity. CRISPR genome editing has a high potential for use in precision gene therapy for various diseases, including cancer and genetic disorders, which are caused by DNA mutations within the genome. However, several studies have shown that targeting the DNA via sequence complementarity is imperfect and subject to unintended genome editing of other genomic loci with similar sequences. These off-target problems pose critical safety issues in the therapeutic applications of CRISPR technology, with particular concerns in terms of the genome editing of pathogenic point mutations, where non-mutant alleles can become an off-target with only a one-base difference. In this study, we sought to assess a novel CRISPR genome editing technique that has been proposed to achieve a high specificity by positioning the mismatches within the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence. To this end, we compared the genome editing specificities of the PAM-based and conventional methods on an oncogenic single-base mutation in the endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR). The results indicated that the PAM-based method provided a significantly increased genome editing specificity for pathogenic mutant alleles with single-base precision.

Indexed as

Point MutationCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA, ComplementaryDNA, IntergenicErbB ReceptorsGene EditingHumansDNA, ComplementaryDNA, IntergenicEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsCRISPRoff-targetPAMsingle-base precisionspecificity

Identifiers

PMID31877894
PMCPMC6982904
OpenAlexW2995156106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.