Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31877719›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Modeling Physico-Chemical ADMET Endpoints with Multitask Graph Convolutional Networks.

Floriane Montanari, Lara Kuhnke, Antonius Ter Laak, Djork-Arné Clevert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Toxicity Prediction.Chemical research in toxicology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Floriane MontanariDigital Technologies, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Lara KuhnkeDigital Technologies, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Antonius Ter LaakDigital Technologies, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Djork-Arné ClevertDigital Technologies, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simple physico-chemical properties, like logD, solubility, or melting point, can reveal a great deal about how a compound under development might later behave. These data are typically measured for most compounds in drug discovery projects in a medium throughput fashion. Collecting and assembling all the Bayer in-house data related to these properties allowed us to apply powerful machine learning techniques to predict the outcome of those assays for new compounds. In this paper, we report our finding that, especially for predicting physicochemical ADMET endpoints, a multitask graph convolutional approach appears a highly competitive choice. For seven endpoints of interest, we compared the performance of that approach to fully connected neural networks and different single task models. The new model shows increased predictive performance compared to previous modeling methods and will allow early prioritization of compounds even before they are synthesized. In addition, our model follows the generalized solubility equation without being explicitly trained under this constraint.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrug DiscoveryMachine LearningModels, ChemicalNeural Networks, ComputerPharmaceutical PreparationsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipPharmaceutical PreparationsADMET predictiongraph convolutional networksmultitask learningQSARsolubility

Identifiers

PMID31877719
PMCPMC6982787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.