Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31877706›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Grape Seeds: Chromatographic Profile of Fatty Acids and Phenolic Compounds and Qualitative Analysis by FTIR-ATR Spectroscopy.

Massimo Lucarini, Alessandra Durazzo, Johannes Kiefer, Antonello Santini, Ginevra Lombardi-Boccia, Eliana B Souto, Annalisa Romani, Anja Lampe, Stefano Ferrari Nicoli, Paolo Gabrielli and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Massimo LucariniCREA-Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Roma, Italy.
Alessandra DurazzoCREA-Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7747-9107
Johannes KieferTechnische Thermodynamik, University of Bremen, Badgasteiner Str. 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0837-3456
Antonello SantiniDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Napoli Federico II, Via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5505-3327
Ginevra Lombardi-BocciaCREA-Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Roma, Italy.
Eliana B SoutoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9737-6017
Annalisa RomaniPHYTOLAB, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (Firenze), Italy.
Anja LampeTechnische Thermodynamik, University of Bremen, Badgasteiner Str. 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Stefano Ferrari NicoliCREA-Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Roma, Italy.
Paolo GabrielliCREA-Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Roma, Italy.
Noemi BevilacquaCREA-Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology, 00049 Velletri (Roma), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2452-2490
Margherita CampoPHYTOLAB, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (Firenze), Italy.
Massimo MorassutCREA-Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology, 00049 Velletri (Roma), Italy.
Francesca CecchiniCREA-Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology, 00049 Velletri (Roma), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7821-7950

Funding

: Project NATUR-BAKERY-INNOV" Innovative production of a bakery line, for well-being and sport, based on functional natural extracts" - POR FESR 2014-2020 - CUP 7429.31052017.113000254: Project Nutraceutica come supporto nutrizionale nel paziente oncologico; CUP: B83D18000140007Italcol SpA, Consulente Enologica Srl :
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary product of the oenological sector is wine. Nonetheless, the grape processing produces large amounts of by-products and wastes, e.g., the grape seeds. In the context of a sustainable production, there is a strong push towards reutilizing these by-products and waste for making useful derivatives since they are rich of bioactive substances with high additional value. As it is true for the wine itself, bringing these by-products derivatives to the market calls for quality measures and analytical tools to assess quality itself. One of the main objectives is to collect analytical data regarding bioactive compounds using potentially green techniques. In the present work, the profile of fatty acids and the main phenolic compounds were investigated by conventional methods. The qualitative analysis of the main functional groups was carried out by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Moreover, the successful use of FTIR technique in combination with chemometric data analysis is shown to be a suitable analytical tool for discriminating the grape seeds. Grape seeds of different origin have different content of bioactive substances, making this technique useful when planning to recover a certain substance with specific potential application in health area as food supplement or nutraceutical. For example, Cesanese d'Affile seeds were found to have a rather high fat content with a significant fraction of unsaturated fatty acids. On the other hand, the seeds of Nero d'Avola exhibit the highest amount of phenolic compounds.

Indexed as

biorefinerychemometricsfatty acidsFTIR spectroscopygrapegrape seedsnutraceuticalsphenolic compounds

Identifiers

PMID31877706
PMCPMC7023066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.