ArticlePloS one2019
The association between dengue incidences and provincial-level weather variables in Thailand from 2001 to 2014.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of dengue in Thailand: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Pooled it
- Temporal and Spatiotemporal Arboviruses Forecasting by Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- The Impact of Meteorological Factors on Communicable Disease Incidence and Its Projection: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Climate Variability Drives Dengue Transmission in Bangladesh.Infectious disease reports · 2026Article
- Spatial occurrence-intensity modeling of dengue incidence in southernmost provinces of Thailand.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Time series analysis of dengue incidence and its association with meteorological risk factors in Bangladesh.PloS one · 2025Article
- Spatial model of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) risk: scoping review.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Short-term effects of tropical cyclones on the incidence of dengue: a time-series study in Guangzhou, China.Parasites & vectors · 2022Article
- Rising trend of dengue in urban areas: A challenge.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Article
- Association between Climate Factors and Dengue Fever in Asuncion, Paraguay: A Generalized Additive Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Temporal Variations and Spatial Clusters of Dengue in Thailand: Longitudinal Study before and during the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Article
- Dengue Early Warning System as Outbreak Prediction Tool: A Systematic Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2022Review
- Berberine Inhibits Dengue Virus through Dual Mechanisms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The association between tropical cyclones and dengue fever in the Pearl River Delta, China during 2013-2018: A time-stratified case-crossover study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- A novel approach to modeling epidemic vulnerability, applied to Aedes aegypti-vectored diseases in Perú.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Added-value of mosquito vector breeding sites from street view images in the risk mapping of dengue incidence in Thailand.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Predictors of plasma leakage among dengue patients in Thailand: A plasma-leak score analysis.PloS one · 2021Observational
- A cross-tabulated analysis for the influence of climate conditions on the incidence of dengue fever in Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia during 2006-2009.International journal of health sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic pose significant burdens in many tropical countries. Dengue incidences have perpetually increased, leading to an annual (uncertain) peak. Dengue cases cause an enormous public health problem in Thailand because there is no anti-viral drug against the dengue virus. Searching for means to reduce the dengue incidences is a challenging and appropriate strategy for primary prevention in a dengue outbreak. This study constructs the best predictive model from past statistical dengue incidences at the provincial level and studies the relationships among dengue incidences and weather variables. We conducted experiments for 65 provinces (out of 77 provinces) in Thailand since there is no dengue information for the remaining provinces. Predictive models were constructed using weekly data during 2001-2014. The training set are data during 2001-2013, and the test set is the data from 2014. Collected data were separated into two parts: current dengue cases as the dependent variable, and weather variables and previous dengue cases as the independent variables. Eight weather variables are used in our models: average pressure, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, average humidity, precipitation, vaporization, wind direction, wind power. Each weather variable includes the current week and one to three weeks of lag time. A total of 32 independent weather variables are used for each province. The previous one to three weeks of dengue cases are also used as independent variables. There is a total of 35 independent variables. Predictive models were constructed using five methods: Poisson regression, negative binomial regression, quasi-likelihood regression, ARIMA(3,1,4) and SARIMA(2,0,1)(0,2,0). The best model is determined by combinations of 1-12 variables, which are 232,989,800 models for each province. We construct a total of 15,144,337,000 models. The best model is selected by the average from high to low of the coefficient of determination (R2) and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE). From our results, the one-week lag previous case variable is the most frequent in 55 provinces out of a total of 65 provinces (coefficient of determinations with a minimum of 0.257 and a maximum of 0.954, average of 0.6383, 95% CI: 0.57313 to 0.70355). The most influential weather variable is precipitation, which is used in most of the provinces, followed by wind direction, wind power, and barometric pressure. The results confirm the common knowledge that dengue incidences occur most often during the rainy season. It also shows that wind direction, wind power, and barometric pressure also have influences on the number of dengue cases. These three weather variables may help adult mosquitos to survive longer and spread dengue. In conclusion, The most influential factor for further cases is the number of dengue cases. However, weather variables are also needed to obtain better results. Predictions of the number of dengue cases should be done locally, not at the national level. The best models of different provinces use different sets of weather variables. Our model has an accuracy that is sufficient for the real prediction of future dengue incidences, to prepare for and protect against severe dengue outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.