Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31877185›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

A novel model for malaria prediction based on ensemble algorithms.

Mengyang Wang, Hui Wang, Jiao Wang, Hongwei Liu, Rui Lu, Tongqing Duan, Xiaowen Gong, Siyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Liu, Zhuang Cui and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Fine-Scale Spatial Prediction on the Risk ofJournal of Korean medical science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mengyang WangDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Heping District, Tianjin, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-8690-6748
Hui WangDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Heping District, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Jiao WangDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Heping District, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Hongwei LiuDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Heping District, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Rui LuDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Heping District, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Tongqing DuanDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Heping District, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Xiaowen GongDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Heping District, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Siyuan FengDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Heping District, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Yuanyuan LiuDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Heping District, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Zhuang CuiDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Heping District, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Changping LiDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Heping District, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Jun MaDepartment of Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Heping District, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Tianjin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveMost previous studies adopted single traditional time series models to predict incidences of malaria. A single model cannot effectively capture all the properties of the data structure. However, a stacking architecture can solve this problem by combining distinct algorithms and models. This study compares the performance of traditional time series models and deep learning algorithms in malaria case prediction and explores the application value of stacking methods in the field of infectious disease prediction.

methodsThe ARIMA, STL+ARIMA, BP-ANN and LSTM network models were separately applied in simulations using malaria data and meteorological data in Yunnan Province from 2011 to 2017. We compared the predictive performance of each model through evaluation measures: RMSE, MASE, MAD. In addition, gradient-boosting regression trees (GBRTs) were used to combine the above four models. We also determined whether stacking structure improved the model prediction performance.

resultsThe root mean square errors (RMSEs) of the four sub-models were 13.176, 14.543, 9.571 and 7.208; the mean absolute scaled errors (MASEs) were 0.469, 0.472, 0.296 and 0.266 and the mean absolute deviation (MAD) were 6.403, 7.658, 5.871 and 5.691. After using the stacking architecture combined with the above four models, the RMSE, MASE and MAD values of the ensemble model decreased to 6.810, 0.224 and 4.625, respectively.

conclusionsA novel ensemble model based on the robustness of structured prediction and model combination through stacking was developed. The findings suggest that the predictive performance of the final model is superior to that of the other four sub-models, indicating that stacking architecture may have significant implications in infectious disease prediction.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsChinaCommunicable DiseasesHumansIncidenceMalaria

Identifiers

PMID31877185
PMCPMC6932799
OpenAlexW2997458830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.