Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31877180›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The home field advantage of modern plant breeding.

Patrick M Ewing, Bryan C Runck, Thomas Y J Kono, Michael B Kantar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genotype-by-environment interactions and local adaptation shape selection in the US National Chip Processing Trial.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Biocultural diversity and crop improvement.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Data-driven approaches can harness crop diversity to address heterogeneous needs for breeding products.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick M EwingDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
Bryan C RunckGEMS Agroinformatics Initiative, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Thomas Y J KonoMinnesota Supercomputing Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1388-3194
Michael B KantarDepartment of Tropical Plant and Soil Science, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5542-0975
Michigan State University · USMinnesota Supercomputing Institute · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the mid-20th century, crop breeding has driven unprecedented yield gains. Breeders generally select for broadly- and reliably-performing varieties that display little genotype-by-environment interaction (GxE). In contrast, ecological theory predicts that across environments that vary spatially or temporally, the most productive population will be a mixture of narrowly adapted specialists. We quantified patterns of broad and narrow adaptation in modern, commercial maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids planted across 216 site-years, from 1999-2018, for the University of Illinois yield trials. We found that location was the dominant source of yield variation (44.5%), and yearly weather was the smallest (1.7%), which suggested a benefit for reliable performance in narrow biophysical environments. Varieties displayed a large "home field advantage" when growing in the location of best performance relative to other varieties. Home field advantage accounted for 19% of GxE and provided a yield increase of 1.01 ± 0.04 Mg ∙ ha-1 (7.6% relative to mean yield), yet was both smaller than predicted by a null model and unchanged across time. This counterfactual suggests that commercial breeding programs have missed an opportunity to further increase yields by leveraging local adaptation. Public breeding programs may pursue this opportunity by releasing specialist varieties that perform reliably in narrow environments. As seed sources are increasingly privatized and consolidated, this alternate strategy may compliment private breeding to support global food security.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenotypeHybridization, GeneticPhenotypePlant BreedingZea mays

Identifiers

PMID31877180
PMCPMC6932805
OpenAlexW2998722192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.