Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31877090›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2020

Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure for the Treatment of Chronic Anterior Shoulder Instability: Patients With Prior Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Primary Cases.

Jean-David Werthel, Vincent Sabatier, Bradley Schoch, Lior Amsallem, Geoffroy Nourissat, Philippe Valenti, Jean Kany, Julien Deranlot, Nicolas Solignac, Philippe Hardy and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. [Chronic posttraumatic shoulder instability].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean-David WerthelHopital Ambroise Paré, Paris, France.
Vincent SabatierGroupe Maussins, Paris, France.
Bradley SchochDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Lior AmsallemHopital Ambroise Paré, Paris, France.
Geoffroy Nourissat
Philippe Valenti
Jean Kany
Julien Deranlot
Nicolas Solignac
Philippe Hardy
Marie ViganInstitut Curie, Paris, France.
Alexandre HardyHopital Ambroise Paré, Paris, France.
Hôpital Ambroise-Paré · FRClinique du Sport · FRInstitut Curie · FRMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt remains unclear whether results differ between a Latarjet procedure performed after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair and one performed as the primary operation. PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative outcomes of the Latarjet procedure when performed as primary surgery and as revision for a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair. STUDY

designCohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

methodsA multicenter retrospective comparative case-cohort analysis was performed for all patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Patients were separated into 2 groups depending on if the Latarjet procedure was performed after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair (group 1) or as the first operation (group 2). Outcome measures included recurrent instability, reoperation rates, complications, pain, Walch-Duplay scores, and Simple Shoulder Test.

resultsA total of 308 patients were eligible for participation in the study; 72 (23.4%) did not answer and were considered lost to follow-up, leaving 236 patients available for analysis. Mean follow-up was 3.4 ± 0.8 years. There were 20 patients in group 1 and 216 in group 2. Despite similar rates of recurrent instability (5.0% in group 1 vs 2.3% in group 2;

conclusionFunctional outcome scores and postoperative pain are significantly worse in patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair when compared with patients undergoing primary Latarjet. The assumption that a failed a Bankart repair can be revised by a Latarjet with a similar result to a primary Latarjet appears to be incorrect. Surgeons should consider these findings when deciding on the optimal surgical procedure for recurrent shoulder instability.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyArthroscopyAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleParisRecurrenceReoperationRetrospective StudiesShoulder DislocationYoung Adultglenoid labrumshoulder instability

Identifiers

PMID31877090
PMCPMC7052410
OpenAlexW2947391056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.