Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31876974›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in cytometry2020

Confocal Microscopy: Principles and Modern Practices.

Amicia D Elliott

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in cytometry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 183 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
183citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

183 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 392 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A custom two-in-one HIST and line-scanning confocal excitation module.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amicia D ElliottNIMH Section on Neural Function, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Identifying Neural Substrates of Behavior in Drosophila MelanogasterZIAMH002800 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI WHITE, BENJAMIN H · 2009 to 2025
$29.2M
Recording and Modeling Brain-wide Neuronal Activity of the Drosophila Pupal Ecdysis SequenceFI2GM117582 · NIGMS · U.S. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI ELLIOTT, AMICIA DEVIN · 2016 to 2016
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002800NIGMS NIH HHS FI2 GM117582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In light microscopy, illuminating light is passed through the sample as uniformly as possible over the field of view. For thicker samples, where the objective lens does not have sufficient depth of focus, light from sample planes above and below the focal plane will also be detected. The out-of-focus light will add blur to the image, reducing the resolution. In fluorescence microscopy, any dye molecules in the field of view will be stimulated, including those in out-of-focus planes. Confocal microscopy provides a means of rejecting the out-of-focus light from the detector such that it does not contribute blur to the images being collected. This technique allows for high-resolution imaging in thick tissues. In a confocal microscope, the illumination and detection optics are focused on the same diffraction-limited spot in the sample, which is the only spot imaged by the detector during a confocal scan. To generate a complete image, the spot must be moved over the sample and data collected point by point. A significant advantage of the confocal microscope is the optical sectioning provided, which allows for 3D reconstruction of a sample from high-resolution stacks of images. Several types of confocal microscopes have been developed for this purpose, and each has different advantages and disadvantages. This article provides a concise introduction to confocal microscopy. © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophilaHeLa CellsHumansLarvaMicroscopy, ConfocalMicrotubulesSample SizeTime Factorsconfocal microscopyfluorescencelaser scanningresonant scanningspinning disk

Identifiers

PMID31876974
PMCPMC6961134
OpenAlexW2997051184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.