ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2020
An Assessment of Risk Factors for Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Infection in Malawian Women Using 2 Classifications for the HerpeSelect 2 Test.
Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe HerpeSelect 2 ELISA IgG test for herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection is widely used, convenient, and inexpensive. However, it has been shown to have lower specificity among populations in Sub-Saharan Africa compared with HSV-2 tests regarded as criterion standards.
methodsIn 2016, we collected blood and survey data from 248 women participating in a community-based cohort study in rural Malawi (the Umoyo wa Thanzi project). Using multinomial logistic regression accounting for village-level clustering, we examined unadjusted associations between select demographic and sexual risk factors and HSV-2 serostatus. Because increasing the index value cutpoint for a positive result improves specificity, we coded HSV-2 serostatus in 2 ways: the manufacturer's recommended cutpoints (<0.9, negative; 0.9-1.1, indeterminate; >1.1, positive) and modified cutpoints with improved specificity (<0.9, negative; 0.9-3.5, indeterminate; >3.5, positive). We aimed to investigate whether associations between select risk factors and HSV-2 serostatus varied under the 2 approaches.
resultsThe prevalence of HSV-2 in this sample was 67% under the manufacturer's cutpoint and 22% under the modified cutpoint. Under both cutpoints, age, household size, number of marriages, and number of pregnancies were associated with HSV-2-positive serostatus. Using modified cutpoints, current bacterial vaginosis (odds ratio [OR], 3.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-7.47), partner concurrency (OR, 4.88; 95% CI, 2.54-9.37) and unsure about partner concurrency (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.08-3.38) were associated with HSV-2 seropositivity. Household size, education, and marital status were the only variables significantly associated with indeterminate HSV-2 serostatus using the modified cutpoints.
conclusionHSV-2-focused interventions informed by identifying individuals likely to have or acquire HSV-2 must be aware that different target populations may emerge depending on which cutpoints are adopted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.