ArticleMedicine2019
Modified tibial tunnel placement for single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces the "Killer Turn" in a biomechanical model.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arthroscopic Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Reconstruction: characterization of imaging findings and temporal changes on postoperative MRI.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- A Consistent Landmark for Tibial Tunnel Placement in Arthroscopic Remnant-Preserving Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Use of Champagne-Glass Drop-Off and Lateral Cartilage Point-A Retrospective Case Series.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- [Research progress of tibial tunnel positioning techniques in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
- [Impact of tibial tunnel position in artificial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on postoperative knee function and stability].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Biomechanical comparison of three tibial tunnel positions for PCL reconstruction: a 3D finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- What Is the Optimal Position of Low Tibial Tunnel in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? A Quantitative Analysis Based on 2D CT Images and 3D Knee Models.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Anatomic versus Low Tibial Tunnel in Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- A modified anatomical posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique using the posterior septum and posterior capsule as landmarks to position the low tibial tunnel.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- All-Autograft Multiligament Knee Reconstruction of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, and Posterolateral Corner (KD-IIIL).Arthroscopy techniques · 2021Article
- Comparable Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between an Anatomic Tunnel and a Low Tibial Tunnel in Remnant-Preserving Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Graft bending angle of the reconstructed posterior cruciate ligament gradually decreases as knee flexion increases.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur previous three-dimensional finite element analysis found that posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in the modified tibial tunneling placement (MTT, 10 mm inferior and 5 mm lateral to the PCL anatomical insertion) could reduce the peak stress of the graft and may reduce the killer turn. The purpose of the current study was to compare the biomechanical results between MTT and traditional tibial tunneling technique (TTT, PCL anatomical insertion) during transtibial PCL reconstruction.
methodsFifty-six 3D-printed tibia models and fresh mature porcine flexor digitorum tendons were studied. The PCL reconstruction specimens were randomly divided into TTT group and MTT group based on tibial tunnel placement. A 50 to 300 N cyclic loading was applied using a material testing system. Each specimen completed 2000 cycles at a rate of 200 mm/min and a loading frequency of 80 cycles/min. Load-displacement curves, failure mode, and graft displacement were recorded. Mean maximum contact pressure was measured using a pressure-sensitive film. After cyclic loading test, the surviving grafts were randomly assigned to load-to-failure group or Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) group. Ultimate failure load and the appearance of graft abrasion were recorded and analyzed.
resultDuring the cyclic loading test, 3 samples in the TTT group, and 2 in the MTT group were excluded because of the graft pullout during the test. Mean maximum contact pressure of killer turn was 9.30 ± 0.29 MPa in the TTT group and 7.27 ± 0.25 MPa in MTT group (P < .05). Mean graft displacement was 4.54 ± 0.23 mm in the TTT group and 3.37 ± 3.56 mm in the MTT group (P < .05). Maximum failure load was 1886.0 ± 41.83 N in the TTT group and 2019.30 ± 20.10 N in the MTT group (P < .05). The SEM analysis showed heavy abrasion and fiber discontinuity in graft in the TTT group, while it showed slight abrasion and fiber arrangement disorders in the MTT group.
conclusionsThe MTT PCL reconstruction significantly reduced stress concentration and graft abrasion as compared with the TTT PCL reconstruction, and it may be a better choice for the reduction of "killer Turn" effect during transtibial PCL construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.