ArticleMedicine2019
Verification a model of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese pregnant women.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after one lower uterine transverse cesarean section delivery.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Determinants of successful trial of labor after a previous cesarean delivery in East Wollega, Western Ethiopia: A case-control study.SAGE open medicine · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of Predictive Models for Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in China.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Article
- Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Southeast China: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of our research was to confirm the prediction role of Grobman model for vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in Chinese pregnant women. In this research, 535 pregnant who had once cesarean delivery and the least once subsequent try to a vaginal labor in Jiaxing of China were involved. The Grobman background factors and five new factors were included. Overall, in total of 456 women had successful VBAC, the success percent was 85.2%. The new background variable "maternal height" was considered as an additional predictor for VBAC. The Grobman model's area under the curve (AUC) was 0.811 (95% CI = 0.751-0.870) and the AUC of this modified model combined 2 new factors was 0.834 (95% CI = 0.781-0.886). Nevertheless, there has no markedly difference between these 2 models of the AUC. In conclusion, the Grobman model was suitable for Chinese pregnant. However, further improvements were needed to make a new predictive model of VBAC success rate for Chinese pregnant women through analyzing the clinical data of vaginal trial delivery after cesarean section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.