Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31876708›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Phase II study of vincristine, actinomycin-D, cyclophosphamide and irinotecan for patients with newly diagnosed low-risk subset B rhabdomyosarcoma: A study protocol.

Mitsuru Miyachi, Kunihiko Tsuchiya, Ako Hosono, Atsushi Ogawa, Katsuyoshi Koh, Atsushi Kikuta, Junichi Hara, Satoshi Teramukai, Hajime Hosoi

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Systemic Anticancer Therapy Details and Dental Adverse Effects in Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Mitsuru MiyachiDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto.
Kunihiko TsuchiyaDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto.
Ako HosonoDivision of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba.
Atsushi OgawaDepartment of Pediatrics, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata.
Katsuyoshi KohDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama.
Atsushi KikutaDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima.
Junichi HaraDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Children's Medical Center, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka.
Satoshi TeramukaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hajime HosoiDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto.
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPFukushima Medical University Hospital · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPOsaka City General Hospital · JPSaitama Children's Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 80% to 90% of patients with low-risk rhabdomyosarcoma can be cured. However, cured patients often face long-term complications associated with the treatment. An important factor in the treatment plan is the dose of cyclophosphamide administered because the dose can have both acute and long-term side effects. It is therefore essential to investigate whether the dose can be reduced without a negative effect on treatment outcome. The ARST0331 trial revealed that drastically reducing the cyclophosphamide dose to 4.8 g/m negatively affected treatment outcomes. The current study aims to determine whether reducing the cyclophosphamide dose to 10.8 g/m while introducing a new drug, irinotecan, can prevent the negative effect on treatment outcome. We also aim to investigate whether the reduced cyclophosphamide dose results in a decrease in infertility, one of the long-term complications of this treatment.

methodsThe subjects are patients with stage 1 group III rhabdomyosarcoma (excluding those with orbital group III N0 and NX) or patients with stage 3 group I and II low-risk subset B embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma who will alternately undergo VAC 1.2 treatment (vincristine, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide 1.2 g/m) and VI treatment (vincristine, irinotecan). The effectiveness and safety of this treatment regimen will be assessed. Data will be presented at international conferences and will be published in peer-reviewed journals. DISCUSSION: This study is significant because it aims to establish that the use of irinotecan in patients with low-risk subset B embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (aged 30 or younger) allows the dose of cyclophosphamide to be reduced and is associated with few short-term adverse effects and long-term complications. The open-label and single-arm design of this study may be a limitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION AND ETHICAL APPROVAL: The trial registration number is jRCTs051180200 (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials). The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each of the participating centers and the data will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclophosphamideDactinomycinIrinotecanRhabdomyosarcomaVincristineAdultClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicHumansNeoplasm StagingTreatment OutcomeCyclophosphamideDactinomycinIrinotecanVincristine

Identifiers

PMID31876708
PMCPMC6946342
OpenAlexW2997140747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.