Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31876321›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2020

Integrated, Multidisciplinary Management of Pulmonary Nodules Can Streamline Care and Improve Adherence to Recommendations.

Thomas J Roberts, Inga T Lennes, Saif Hawari, Lecia V Sequist, Elyse R Park, Henning Willers, Angela Frank, Henning Gaissert, Jo-Anne Shepard, David Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Incidental Pulmonary Nodules - What Do We Know in 2022.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas J Roberts *Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0709-2270
Inga T Lennes *Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Saif HawariDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lecia V SequistDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Elyse R ParkDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Henning WillersThoracic Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Angela FrankDepartment of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Henning GaissertDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jo-Anne ShepardDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David RyanDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every year millions of pulmonary nodules are discovered incidentally and through lung cancer screening programs. Management of these nodules is often suboptimal, with low follow-up rates and poor provider understanding of management approaches. There is an emerging body of literature about how to optimize management of pulmonary nodules. The Pulmonary Nodule and Lung Cancer Screening Clinic (PNLCSC) at Massachusetts General Hospital was founded in 2012 to manage pulmonary nodules via a multidisciplinary approach with optimized support staff. Recommendations from clinic providers and treatment details were recorded for all patients seen at the PNLCSC. Adherence to recommendations and outcomes were also tracked and reviewed. From October 2012 to September 2019, 1,136 patients were seen at the PNLCSC, each for a mean of 1.8 appointments (range, 1-10). A total of 356 procedures were recommended by the clinic and 271 patients were referred for surgery and/or radiation. The majority of interventions (74%) were recommended at the initial PNLCSC appointment. In total, 211 patients (19%) evaluated at the PNLCSC had pathologically confirmed pulmonary malignancies or were treated empirically with radiation. Among patients followed by the clinic, the adherence rate to clinic recommendations was 95%. This study shows how a multidisciplinary approach to pulmonary nodule management can streamline care and optimize follow-up. The PNLCSC provides a template that can be replicated in other health systems. It also provides an example of how multidisciplinary approaches can be applied to other complex conditions. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This work demonstrates how an integrated, multidisciplinary approach to management of pulmonary nodules can streamline patient care and improve adherence to provider recommendations. This approach has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce health care costs.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSolitary Pulmonary NoduleEarly Detection of CancerHumansMassachusettsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCancer screeningLow-dose CTLung cancerMultidisciplinary carePulmonary nodules

Identifiers

PMID31876321
PMCPMC7216451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.