Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31875879›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2020

Comparing perspectives of family caregivers and healthcare professionals regarding caregiver burden in dementia care: results of a mixed methods study in a rural setting.

Simon Krutter, Dagmar Schaffler-Schaden, Roland Essl-Maurer, Laura Wurm, Alexander Seymer, Celine Kriechmayr, Eva Mann, Juergen Osterbrink, Maria Flamm

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05706792 (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Nordic Sensi Chair in the Treatment of Dementia Behavioral Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05706792 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Nordic Sensi Chair in the Treatment of Dementia Behavioral Disorders (NSC-DEMEN Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y SaludRan2022 to 2022Enrolled88ConditionsDementiaArmsNordic Sensi Chair
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon KrutterInstitute for Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Dagmar Schaffler-SchadenInstitute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Roland Essl-MaurerInstitute for Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Laura WurmInstitute for Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Alexander SeymerDepartment of Sociology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Austria.
Celine KriechmayrInstitute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Eva MannInstitute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Juergen OsterbrinkInstitute for Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Maria FlammInstitute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATUniversity of Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons with dementia (PwD) need support to remain in their own homes as long as possible. Family caregivers, homecare nurses and general practitioners (GPs) play an important role in providing this support, particularly in rural settings. Assessing caregiver burden is important to prevent adverse health effects among this population. This study analysed perceived burden and needs of family caregivers of PwD in rural areas from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and family caregivers.

methodsThis was a sequential explanatory mixed methods study that used both questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Questionnaires measuring caregiver burden, quality of life and nursing needs were distributed to the caregivers; health professionals received questionnaires with adjusted items for each group. Additionally, in-depth qualitative interviews were carried out with eight family caregivers.

resultsThe cross-sectional survey population included GPs (n = 50), homecare nurses (n = 140) and family caregivers (n = 113). Healthcare professionals similarly assessed the psychosocial burden and stress caused by behavioural disturbances as most relevant. Psychological stress, social burden and disruptive behaviour (in that order) were regarded as the most important factors from the caregivers' perspective. It was found that 31% of caregivers reported permanent or frequent caregiver overload. Eight themes related to caregiver burden emerged from the subsequent interviews with caregivers.

conclusionsProfessional support at home on an hourly basis was found to be highly relevant to prevent social isolation and compensate for lack of leisure among caregivers of PwD. Improvement of interprofessional dementia-related education is needed to ensure high-quality primary care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiver BurdenCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesDementiaFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentQuality of Lifecaregiver burdendementiageneral practitionershomecare nursesolder peoplerural setting

Identifiers

PMID31875879
PMCPMC7047818
OpenAlexW2998331098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.