Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31875530›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2020

Choosing to urinate. Circuits and mechanisms underlying voluntary urination.

Sourish Mukhopadhyay, Lisa Stowers

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Neural circuit control of innate behaviors.Science China. Life sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The Rheology of the Carotid Sinus: A Path Toward Bioinspired Intervention.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sourish MukhopadhyayDepartment of Neuroscience, La Jolla, CA, USA; Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Lisa StowersDepartment of Neuroscience, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: stowers@scripps.edu.
Scripps Institution of Oceanography · US

Funding

Identifying, manipulating, and studying a complete sensory-to-motor model behavior circuitR01NS108439 · NINDS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI STOWERS, LISA · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS108439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decision to urinate is a social behavior that is calculated multiple times a day. Many animals perform urine scent-marking which broadcasts their pheromones to regulate the behavior of others and humans are trained at an early age to urinate only at a socially acceptable time and place. The inability to control when and where to void, that is incontinence, causes extreme social discomfort yet targeted therapeutics are lacking because little is known about the underlying circuits and mechanisms. The use of animal models, neurocircuit analysis, and functional manipulation is beginning to reveal basic logic of the circuit that modulates the decision of when and where to void.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalUrinationAnimalsOdorantsPheromonesSocial BehaviorPheromones

Identifiers

PMID31875530
PMCPMC7055485
OpenAlexW2997771206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.