Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31875475›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2020

Demographic, Physiologic, and Lifestyle Characteristics Observed with Serum Total Folate Differ Among Folate Forms: Cross-Sectional Data from Fasting Samples in the NHANES 2011-2016.

Zia Fazili, Maya R Sternberg, Nancy Potischman, Chia-Yih Wang, Renee J Storandt, Lorraine Yeung, Sedigheh Yamini, Jaime J Gahche, WenYen Juan, Yan Ping Qi and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zia FaziliCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Maya R SternbergCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nancy PotischmanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Chia-Yih WangCDC, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, USA.
Renee J StorandtCDC, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, USA.
Lorraine YeungCDC, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sedigheh YaminiFood and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
Jaime J GahcheNational Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements, Bethesda, MD, USA.
WenYen JuanFood and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
Yan Ping QiCDC, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Neelima PaladugulaNational Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Gwendolyn GabeyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Christine M PfeifferCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition · USNational Center for Health Statistics · USNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerum folate forms were measured in the US population during recent NHANES to assess folate status.

objectiveWe describe post-folic acid-fortification concentrations of serum folate forms in the fasting US population ≥1 y from the NHANES 2011-2016.

methodsWe measured 5 biologically active folates and 1 oxidation product (MeFox) of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-methyl-THF). We calculated geometric means of 5-methyl-THF, unmetabolized folic acid (UMFA), nonmethyl folate (sum of tetrahydrofolate, 5-formyltetrahydrofolate, and 5,10-methenyltetrahydrofolate), total folate (sum of above biomarkers), and MeFox by demographic, physiologic, and lifestyle variables; estimated the magnitude of variables on biomarker concentrations after covariate adjustment; and determined the prevalence of UMFA >2 nmol/L.

resultsAfter demographic adjustment, age, sex, and race-Hispanic origin were significantly associated with most folate forms. MeFox increased with age, while 5-methyl-THF, UMFA, and nonmethyl folate displayed U-shaped age patterns. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks had 23% lower predicted 5-methyl-THF but comparable UMFA; non-Hispanic Asians had comparable 5-methyl-THF but 28% lower UMFA; Hispanics, non-Hispanic Asians, and non-Hispanic blacks had ∼20% lower MeFox. After additional physiologic and lifestyle adjustment, predicted UMFA and MeFox concentrations were 43% and 112% higher, respectively, in adults with chronic kidney disease and 17% and 15% lower, respectively, in adults consuming daily 1-<2 alcoholic beverages; 5-methyl-THF concentrations were 20% lower in adult smokers. The prevalence of UMFA >2 nmol/L was highest in persons aged ≥70 y (9.01%) and lowest in those aged 12-19 y (1.14%). During 2011-2014, the prevalence was 10.6% in users and 2.22% in nonusers of folic acid-containing supplements.

conclusionsIn fasting persons ≥1 y, the demographic, physiologic, and lifestyle characteristics observed with serum total folate differed among folate forms, suggesting biological and/or genetic influences on folate metabolism. High UMFA was mostly observed in supplement users and older persons.

Indexed as

Life StyleNutrition SurveysAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFolic AcidHumansInfantMaleMiddle Aged5-methyltetrahydrofolateBiomarkersFolic AcidTetrahydrofolates5-methyltetrahydrofolatefolate oxidation productLC-MS/MSMeFoxNHANESunmetabolized folic acid

Identifiers

PMID31875475
PMCPMC7138665
OpenAlexW2997421291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.