Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31875422›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2020

Poor maternal nutrition during gestation in sheep alters prenatal muscle growth and development in offspring.

Mary C Gauvin, Sambhu M Pillai, Sarah A Reed, John R Stevens, Maria L Hoffman, Amanda K Jones, Steven A Zinn, Kristen E Govoni

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identification ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary C GauvinDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Sambhu M PillaiDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Sarah A ReedDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
John R StevensDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Utah State University, Logan, UT.
Maria L HoffmanDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Amanda K JonesDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Steven A ZinnDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Kristen E GovoniDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
University of Connecticut · USUtah State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor maternal nutrition during gestation can have immediate and life-long negative effects on offspring growth and health. In livestock, this leads to reduced product quality and increased costs of production. Based on previous evidence that both restricted- and overfeeding during gestation decrease offspring muscle growth and alter metabolism postnatally, we hypothesized that poor maternal nutrition during gestation would reduce the growth and development of offspring muscle prenatally, reduce the number of myogenic progenitor cells, and result in changes in the global expression of genes involved in prenatal muscle development and function. Ewes were fed a control (100% NRC)-, restricted (60% NRC)-, or overfed (140% NRC) diet beginning on day 30 of gestation until days 45, 90, and 135 of gestation or until parturition. At each time point fetuses and offspring (referred to as CON, RES, and OVER) were euthanized and longissimus dorsi (LM), semitendinosus (STN), and triceps brachii (TB) were collected at each time point for histological and RNA-Seq analysis. In fetuses and offspring, we did not observe an effect of diet on cross-sectional area (CSA), but CSA increased over time (P < 0.05). At day 90, RES and OVER had reduced secondary:primary muscle fiber ratios in LM (P < 0.05), but not in STN and TB. However, in STN and TB percent PAX7-positive cells were decreased compared with CON (P < 0.05). Maternal diet altered LM mRNA expression of 20 genes (7 genes downregulated in OVER and 2 downregulated in RES compared with CON; 5 downregulated in OVER compared with RES; false discovery rate (FDR)-adj. P < 0.05). A diet by time interaction was not observed for any genes in the RNA-Seq analysis; however, 2,205 genes were differentially expressed over time between days 90 and 135 and birth (FDR-adj. P < 0.05). Specifically, consistent with increased protein accretion, changes in muscle function, and increased metabolic activity during myogenesis, changes in genes involved in cell cycle, metabolic processes, and protein synthesis were observed during fetal myogenesis. In conclusion, poor maternal nutrition during gestation contributes to altered offspring muscle growth during early fetal development which persists throughout the fetal stage. Based on muscle-type-specific effects of maternal diet, it is important to evaluate more than one type of muscle to fully elucidate the effects of maternal diet on offspring muscle development.

Indexed as

Animal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMuscle DevelopmentAnimalsDietDown-RegulationFemaleFetal DevelopmentGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMuscle, SkeletalPregnancySequence Analysis, RNASheepVitaminsfetal programmingmusclemyogenesisnutritionsheep

Identifiers

PMID31875422
PMCPMC6981092
OpenAlexW2998578626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.