ArticleCancer medicine2020
Hopkins criteria for residual disease assessment after definitive radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in predicting the treatment response of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.The neuroradiology journal · 2022Article
- Tumor Blood Flow Is a Predictor of Radiotherapy Response in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Hopkins criteria for residual disease assessment after definitive radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAssessment of viable tumor residue after definitive radiotherapy is essential in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aimed to investigate the use of Hopkins criteria on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for posttreatment response evaluation and whether plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA could bring additional value. MATERIALS AND
methodsNPC patients who underwent FDG-PET/CT scan within 26 weeks after definitive radiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Residual disease was evaluated by Hopkins 5-point score. Accuracy of Hopkins criteria before and after incorporating EBV DNA was calculated. Prognostic value for locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed.
resultsOne hundred and sixteen patients were evaluated. Median follow-up time was 28.3 months (range 3.3-92.0 months). Residual disease was found in 19 (16.4%) patients. Overall, Hopkins criteria had high specificity (86.6%; 95% CI, 78.2%-92.7%) and negative prognostic value (NPV) (94.4%; 95% CI, 88.7%-97.3%), while sensitivity and positive prognostic value (PPV) was 73.7% (95% CI, 48.8%-90.9%), 51.9% (95% CI, 37.8%-65.6%), respectively. Posttreatment plasma EBV DNA was not predictive of residual tumor (P = .272). PPV and accuracy were 50.0% (95% CI, 32.1%-67.9%) and 83.0% (95% CI, 73.8%-90.0%) after incorporating detectable EBV DNA into the scoring system. Positive PET/CT results were significantly correlated with inferior 3-year LRFFS (95.7% vs 79.5%, P = .043) and 3-year DFS (84.6% vs 54.4%, P = .028).
conclusionsThe Hopkins criteria demonstrated high NPV and specificity in posttreatment assessment, with the potential to be a reliable prognostic indicator for locoregional failure. Combining EBV DNA with PET/CT did not improve diagnostic accuracies. PET/CT should not be performed less than 12 weeks after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.