Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31875285›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2021

Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease referred to PET myocardial perfusion imaging: A meta-analysis.

Roberta Green, Valeria Cantoni, Wanda Acampa, Roberta Assante, Emilia Zampella, Carmela Nappi, Valeria Gaudieri, Teresa Mannarino, Renato Cuocolo, Mario Petretta and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Coronary vascular dysfunction is associated with increased risk of death in patients with peripheral artery disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Interaction of impaired myocardial flow reserve and extent of myocardial ischemia assessed usingJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Including myocardial flow reserve by PET in prediction models: Ready to fly?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Incremental prognostic value of positron emission tomography derived left ventricular mass.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Reduced acquisition time for thallium myocardial perfusion imaging with large field cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT/CT cameras: An equivalence study.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Scintillation cameras: A new clinical era has come.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Relation between myocardial blood flow and cardiac events in diabetic patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberta GreenDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Valeria CantoniDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Wanda AcampaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Roberta AssanteDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Emilia ZampellaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Carmela NappiDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Valeria GaudieriDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Teresa MannarinoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Renato CuocoloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Mario PetrettaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Alberto CuocoloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. cuocolo@unina.it.
Federico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe performed a meta-meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessed by cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD).

methodsStudies published until April 2019 were identified by database search. We included studies if they evaluated CFR by PET providing data on adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the occurrence of adverse events. Annualized event rates were calculated and the incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated to compare patients with impaired and preserved CFR.

resultsWe identified 13 eligible articles including 11,867 patients with a follow-up ranging from 0.6 to 7.1 years. The HR for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was reported in 11 studies and pooled HR was 1.93 (95% CI 1.65-2.27). The HR for the occurrence of hard events was reported in 5 studies and pooled HR was 3.11 (95% CI 1.88-5.14). Six studies reported data useful to calculate separately the incidence rate of MACE in patients with preserved and impaired CFR and pooled IRR was 2.26 (CI 95% 1.79-2.85). Three studies reported data useful to calculate separately the incidence rate of hard events in patients with preserved and impaired CFR and pooled IRR was 4.12 (CI 95% 3.08-5.51). At meta-regression analysis, we found an association between HR for MACE and gender, diabetes and hypertension, while no significant association was found between HR for hard events and demographic and clinical variables.

conclusionIn patients with suspected or known CAD, an impaired CFR is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. However, the large heterogeneity in study population underlines the need for further investigations to maximize the prognostic role of CFR.

Indexed as

Fractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisCoronary artery diseaseMeta-analysisMyocardial perfusion imagingPET

Identifiers

PMID31875285
OpenAlexW2998378449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.