Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2020
Self-management of accidental bowel leakage and interest in a supportive m-Health app among women.
Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patients' experiences with self-management of conservative interventions for fecal incontinence.Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Development, usability, and randomized pilot feasibility study of a mobile application prototype supporting self-management of accidental bowel leakage.Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of mobile applications for patients with fecal incontinence using a modified APPLICATIONS scoring system.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSelf-management with clinician guidance is a cornerstone of successful conservative treatment for accidental bowel leakage (ABL). There are currently few resources to assist patients with that essential self-management. The purpose of this study was to describe self-management of ABL and explore interest in a mobile health application (m-Health app) for supporting ABL self-management among community-living women.
methodsUsing an observational/descriptive design, women (18+ years) previously seen in a urogynecology clinic for ABL were mailed a survey containing eight multiple-choice questions and an open-ended prompt for comments.
resultsSurvey responses were received from 161 women (18% response rate). The highest percentage of participants was aged 61-70 years (39%). Nearly half of the participants (47%) "did not know anything" about ABL self-management before visiting a clinician. Only 4% "knew a lot." Of those who have been trying to self-manage their ABL (n = 132), 37% reported that it was not effective, and only 5% thought their self-management was "very effective." Half (50%) of the participants had "a lot of" interest in an m-Health app to support managing ABL, and 30% had "some" interest. The vast majority (89%) thought that it was "very important" to have ongoing guidance and support for self-managing ABL.
conclusionsBefore visiting a clinician, most women with ABL lacked knowledge about ABL self-management, and their self-management was not very effective. Women thought having guidance to self-manage ABL was important. There would be good interest among women in an m-Health app supporting self-management of ABL if one were created.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.