ArticlePeerJ2019
Crowdsourcing visual perception experiments: a case of contrast threshold.
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the reliability of an online measure of the temporal binding window of audiovisual integration.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Perception of nonrigid structures from motion using tracking image gradient vectors.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Comparing data quality from an online and in-person lab sample on dynamic theory of mind tasks.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Assessing the reliability of web-based measurements of visual function.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- jsQuestPlus: A JavaScript implementation of the QUEST+ method for estimating psychometric function parameters in online experiments.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- An Open-Source Cognitive Test Battery to Assess Human Attention and Memory.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Bayesian Adaptive Estimation with Theoretical Bound: An Exploration-Exploitation Approach.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- A Web-Based Auditory and Visual Emotion Perception Task Experiment With Children and a Comparison of Lab Data and Web Data.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Article
- Warning 'Don't spread' versus 'Don't be a spreader' to prevent the COVID-19 pandemic.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Stage 2 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors.F1000Research · 2020Article
- A dataset for the perceived vulnerability to disease scale in Japan before the spread of COVID-19.F1000Research · 2020Article
- Article
- Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors.F1000Research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crowdsourcing has commonly been used for psychological research but not for studies on sensory perception. A reason is that in online experiments, one cannot ensure that the rigorous settings required for the experimental environment are replicated. The present study examined the suitability of online experiments on basic visual perception, particularly the contrast threshold. We conducted similar visual experiments in the laboratory and online, employing three experimental conditions. The first was a laboratory experiment, where a small sample of participants (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.