Trial reportScientific reports2019
Automated Quantification of Macular Ellipsoid Zone Intensity in Glaucoma Patients: the Method and its Comparison with Manual Quantification.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Measurement Techniques for Photoreceptor Loss in Geographic Atrophy.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Automated Detection of Glaucoma With Interpretable Machine Learning Using Clinical Data and Multimodal Retinal Images.American journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Challenges Associated With Ellipsoid Zone Intensity Measurements Using Optical Coherence Tomography.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Validation of an Automated Quantification of Relative Ellipsoid Zone Reflectivity on Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography Images.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The macular ellipsoid zone intensity (mEZi) is a known marker of disease severity in a number of diverse ocular diseases. The purpose of this study was to establish an automated method (AM) for mEZi quantification and to compare the method's performance with that of a manual method (MM) for glaucoma patients and healthy controls. Seventy-one (71) mild-to-moderate glaucoma patients, 71 severe-glaucoma patients, and 51 controls were enrolled. Both calibration (n = 160) and validation (n = 33) image sets were compiled. The correlation of AM to MM quantification was assessed by Deming regression for the calibration set, and a compensation formula was generated. Then, for each image in the validation set, the compensated AM quantification was compared with the mean of five repetitive MM quantifications. The AM quantification of the calibration set was found to be linearly correlated with MM in the normal-to-severe-stage glaucoma patients (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.