ArticleScientific reports2019
The effect of unsteady streamflow and stream-groundwater interactions on oxygen consumption in a sandy streambed.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transformation of organic micropollutants along hyporheic flow in bedforms of river-simulating flumes.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Streamflow dynamics are often ignored when studying biogeochemical processes in the hyporheic zone. We explored the interactive effects of unsteady streamflow and groundwater fluxes on the delivery and consumption of oxygen within the hyporheic zone using a recirculating flume packed with natural sandy sediments. The flume was equipped with a programmable streamflow control and drainage system that was used to impose losing and gaining fluxes. Tracer tests were used to measure hyporheic exchange flux and a planar optode was used to measure subsurface oxygen concentration patterns. It was found that the volume of the oxic zone decreased when the losing flux declined, and was drastically decreased when gaining conditions were applied. It was also found that unsteady streamflow led to a slight increase in the average volume of the oxic zone, compared to the average volume of the oxic zone under steady streamflow. However, the average oxygen consumption rates were significantly higher under unsteady streamflow compared to steady streamflow under all groundwater conditions with the exception of the highest losing flux. The present study provides the first insight into the interactions between streamflow unsteadiness and losing/gaining fluxes and improve understanding of their impact on microbial metabolism in the hyporheic zone.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.