Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31874985›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2019

Neural and behavioral changes driven by observationally-induced hypoalgesia.

Nandini Raghuraman, Yang Wang, Lieven A Schenk, Andrew J Furman, Christina Tricou, David A Seminowicz, Luana Colloca

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Placebo and nocebo effect in pain.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nandini RaghuramanDepartment of Pain and Translational Symptom Sciences University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yang WangDepartment of Pain and Translational Symptom Sciences University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lieven A SchenkSocial Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society, Berlin, Germany.
Andrew J FurmanDepartment of Neural Pain Sciences University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Christina TricouDepartment of Neural Pain Sciences University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David A SeminowiczDepartment of Neural Pain Sciences University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3111-3756
Luana CollocaDepartment of Pain and Translational Symptom Sciences University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA. colloca@umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6503-4709
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USMax Planck Society · DE

Funding

QAQC Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR003098 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2019 to 2023
$57.7M
Neural correlates of hypoalgesia driven by observationR01AT010333 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI COLLOCA, LUANA · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003098NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT010333U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) 1R01 AT010333-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observing successful pain treatment in others can induce anticipatory neural processes that, in turn, relieve pain. Previous studies have suggested that social learning and observation influence placebo hypoalgesia. Here, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to determine the neurophysiological changes associated with pain relief acquired through the observation. Thirty-one participants observed a demonstrator undergo painful heat stimulations paired with a "control" cream and non-painful ones paired with a "treatment" cream, which actually were both Vanicreams. After their observation, the participants then received the same creams and stimulations. We found that the treatment cream led to lower self-reported pain intensity ratings than the control cream. Anticipatory treatment cues elicited smaller P2 in electrodes F1, Fz, FC1, and FCz than the control condition. The P2 component localization indicated a higher current density in the right middle frontal gyrus, a region associated with attentional engagement. In placebo responders, the sensorimotor cortex activity captured in electrodes C3, Cz, and C4 indicated that hypoalgesia was positively correlated with resting state peak alpha frequency (PAF). These results suggest that observationally-induced placebo hypoalgesia may be driven by anticipatory mechanisms that modulate frontal attentional processes. Furthermore, resting state PAF could serve as a predictor of observationally-induced hypoalgesia.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryPain ManagementPain MeasurementFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMalePain

Identifiers

PMID31874985
PMCPMC6930247
OpenAlexW2996778836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.